2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac375a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Uncertain Future of Massive Binaries Obscures the Origin of LIGO/Virgo Sources

Abstract: The LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave observatories have detected at least 50 double black hole (BH) coalescences. This sample is large enough to have allowed several recent studies to draw conclusions about the implied branching ratios between isolated binaries versus dense stellar clusters as the origin of double BHs. It has also led to the exciting suggestion that the population is highly likely to contain primordial BHs. Here we demonstrate that such conclusions cannot yet be robust because of the large curren… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the stellar collapse and SN engine mechanism which is the main subject of this work, there are many other uncertain processes that dictate the formation of DCO mergers. Some examples of such processes or parameters which may significantly influence physical properties of DCO mergers are: the metallicity-specific star formation rate density and initial mass function (Chruślińska et al 2020;Santoliquido et al 2021;Broekgaarden et al 2021a;Briel et al 2021;Kroupa & Jerabkova 2021), stellar winds (Vink et al 2001;Sander et al 2022), convection and overshooting (Klencki et al 2021;Belczynski et al 2022), NS and BH natal kicks (Mandel et al 2021;Igoshev et al 2021), type and rate of mass transfer and the outcome of stable/unstable RLOF (Vinciguerra et al 2020;Howitt et al 2020;Bavera et al 2020;Vigna-Gómez et al 2022). The assumptions adopted for this work are described in Section 2.…”
Section: Discussion Of Caveats and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the stellar collapse and SN engine mechanism which is the main subject of this work, there are many other uncertain processes that dictate the formation of DCO mergers. Some examples of such processes or parameters which may significantly influence physical properties of DCO mergers are: the metallicity-specific star formation rate density and initial mass function (Chruślińska et al 2020;Santoliquido et al 2021;Broekgaarden et al 2021a;Briel et al 2021;Kroupa & Jerabkova 2021), stellar winds (Vink et al 2001;Sander et al 2022), convection and overshooting (Klencki et al 2021;Belczynski et al 2022), NS and BH natal kicks (Mandel et al 2021;Igoshev et al 2021), type and rate of mass transfer and the outcome of stable/unstable RLOF (Vinciguerra et al 2020;Howitt et al 2020;Bavera et al 2020;Vigna-Gómez et al 2022). The assumptions adopted for this work are described in Section 2.…”
Section: Discussion Of Caveats and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of mass transfer represents a key source of uncertainty in isolated binary evolution (Belczynski et al 2022). Is the mass transfer dynamically stable?…”
Section: Isolated Binary Evolution With Mass Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of physical uncertainties embed models of massive-star binary evolution, which have significant impacts on the population properties of their BBH remnants (e.g. Bouffanais et al 2019;Stevenson et al 2019;van Son et al 2020;Bavera et al 2021b;Belczynski et al 2021;Santoliquido et al 2021;. Though recent studies have become increasingly thorough in their coverage of this highly uncertain parameter space (see Broekgaarden et al 2021 for a recent overview), it is computationally expensive and can make interpretation difficult.…”
Section: Physical Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%