2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The true picture of environmental DNA, a case study in harvested fishponds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that while increasing PCR replication improves the probability of detection, as observed in our case-study, in metabarcoding studies detectability is also influenced by sample read depth (Shirazi et al, 2021). Many eDNA metabarcoding studies pool PCR replicates as one multiplex (Blabolil et al, 2022;Griffiths et al, 2020;Hänfling et al, 2016).…”
Section: Optimising Single-site Replicationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that while increasing PCR replication improves the probability of detection, as observed in our case-study, in metabarcoding studies detectability is also influenced by sample read depth (Shirazi et al, 2021). Many eDNA metabarcoding studies pool PCR replicates as one multiplex (Blabolil et al, 2022;Griffiths et al, 2020;Hänfling et al, 2016).…”
Section: Optimising Single-site Replicationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It should be noted that while increasing PCR replication improves the probability of detection, as observed in our case-study, in metabarcoding studies detectability is also influenced by sample read depth (Shirazi et al ., 2021). Many eDNA metabarcoding studies pool PCR replicates as one multiplex (Blabolil et al ., 2022; Griffiths et al ., 2020; Hänfling et al ., 2016). However, relative sample read depth should be considered when pooling many PCR replicates, as significant reductions in read depth may hamper the increased detectability gained from adding additional replicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have found that eDNA metabarcoding can reflect long-term (Hänfling et al, 2016) and contemporary (Di Muri et al, 2020) fish catch data in lentic systems. Further, in lentic systems, eDNA signal has been found to be more homogenous in autumn/winter compared to the summer, and as a result detection probability is increased (Blabolil et al, 2022;Handley et al, 2019). Numerous studies have also found eDNA metabarcoding to yield high sensitivity in lotic systems (Griffiths et al, 2020;Hallam et al, 2021;McColl-Gausden et al, 2021;McDevitt et al, 2019;Muha et al, 2021;Pont et al, 2018), but detectability in rivers can be more unpredictable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%