2005
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs

Abstract: Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) and small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are two of the largest classes of non-protein-coding RNAs. Conventional gene finders that detect protein-coding genes do not find tRNA and snoRNA genes because they lack the codon structure and statistical signatures of protein-coding genes. Previously, we developed tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS for the detection of tRNAs, methylation-guide snoRNAs and pseudouridylation-guide snoRNAs, respectively. tRNAscan-SE is routinely applied to completed genomes,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1,573
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,040 publications
(1,577 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1,573
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…bch.umontreal.ca/cgi-bin/mfannot/mfannotInterface.pl) and GLIMMER (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/MICROBES/ glimmer_3.cgi). tRNAs were annotated using tRNAscan-SE (Schattner et al 2005). All ORFs were searched and identified by ORFFinder.…”
Section: Phlebopus Portentosus; Mitogenome; Phylogenetic Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bch.umontreal.ca/cgi-bin/mfannot/mfannotInterface.pl) and GLIMMER (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/MICROBES/ glimmer_3.cgi). tRNAs were annotated using tRNAscan-SE (Schattner et al 2005). All ORFs were searched and identified by ORFFinder.…”
Section: Phlebopus Portentosus; Mitogenome; Phylogenetic Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When loci on both strands were predicted, only the hit with the highest score was kept. Transfer RNAs were also predicted using tRNAscan‐SE v. 1.23 (Schattner et al ., 2005) with default parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reads were mapped to the final assembly sequence, PCR duplicates were flagged using the MarkDuplicates tool of the Picard command-line tools software suite (http://picard.sourceforge.net/index.shtml), and a consensus was called using SAMtools v. 0.1.19 ). The reference genome assembly was initially annotated using DOGMA (Wyman et al, 2004), with the annotations refined using tRNAscan-SE (Schattner et al, 2005) and additional BLAST searches. The inverted repeats were analyzed using the program Inverted Repeats Finder (Warburton et al, 2004) with T7 set to 500,000 and a maximum loop size of 1,000,000.…”
Section: Assembly Of the Hawaiian Mint Reference Chloroplast Genomementioning
confidence: 99%