2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Treat-and-Extend Injection Regimen Versus Alternate Dosing Strategies in Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding demonstrates that the negative perceptions of the high number of injections required in the first 12 months of treatment and lower chance of visual acuity markedly improving after 12 months of treatment, taken together, overshadowed patients' positive perceptions of the high chance for visual acuity maintenance after 2 years of treatment. In a recent meta-analysis, T&E using ranibizumab was shown to be superior to PRN and as effective as monthly dosing in improving visual acuity outcomes, 46 with a weighted frequency of 8.6 injections in 1 year. 47 The worst T&E profile, which is associated with a high number of injections required in the first 12 months of treatment, is similar to a monthly dosing regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding demonstrates that the negative perceptions of the high number of injections required in the first 12 months of treatment and lower chance of visual acuity markedly improving after 12 months of treatment, taken together, overshadowed patients' positive perceptions of the high chance for visual acuity maintenance after 2 years of treatment. In a recent meta-analysis, T&E using ranibizumab was shown to be superior to PRN and as effective as monthly dosing in improving visual acuity outcomes, 46 with a weighted frequency of 8.6 injections in 1 year. 47 The worst T&E profile, which is associated with a high number of injections required in the first 12 months of treatment, is similar to a monthly dosing regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-word clinical settings differ from clinical trial in several ways: patients were unselected and diverse; with range of comorbidity and a wider range of treatments, paradigms are implemented. It has been shown that functional stability is better in T&E compared with PRN with a 1.6 more injections but fewer clinical visits [21]. Real-world studies demonstrated that proactive dosing with aflibercept yields similar outcome to those observed in clinical trials and proactive TE-regimen is superior to PRN-regimen in clinical routine care of nAMD [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies like the TREX-AMD (2017), TREND (2018), and CANTREAT (2019) trials demonstrated noninferiority of ranibizumab with TER versus monthly regimen in treatment-naïve eyes, in patients treated up to 1 year [ 25 27 ]. Similarly, systematic reviews by Gemenetzi and Patel, Rufai et al and Okada et al suggested that TER is superior to PRN and comparable to monthly injections in the short term and highlighted the need for more real-word long-term data [ 20 , 28 , 29 ]. Of note, although we present statistically significant change in BCVA as p value <0.05 (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TER consists of a loading phase of 3 monthly injections, followed by a maintenance phase where patients are given an injection at each visit and treatment interval is gradually extended or shortened, based on the absence or presence of disease activity [ 17 ]. Several trials have since demonstrated the efficacy of TER, but visual acuity outcomes remained inferior to the data obtained in the original landmark randomized clinical trials [ 18 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%