The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Multiple Certificate Status Request Extension

Pettersen, Yngve

doi:10.17487/rfc6961

Cited by 48 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…-Many devices that use certificates do not check the revocation status of certificates, even though extensions like Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) stapling exists [RFC6961] and is increasingly deployed with Web browsers. The workshop participants did not reach a conclusion regarding the recommendations of certificate revocation checking, although the importance has been recognized.…”

Section: Miscellaneous Pointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Report from the Internet of Things Software Update (IoTSU) Workshop 2016

Farrell¹,

Tschofenig²

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Miscellaneous Pointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Report from the Internet of Things Software Update (IoTSU) Workshop 2016

Farrell¹,

Tschofenig²

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These extensions are used to support in-band exchange of Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) tokens, otherwise known as OCSP stapling. These extensions are described in [RFC6066] and [RFC6961].…”

Section: Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

X.509v3 Transport Layer Security (TLS) Feature Extension

Hallam-Baker¹

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…During TLS tunnel establishment, TLS extensions MAY be used. For instance, the Certificate Status Request extension [RFC6066] and the Multiple Certificate Status Request extension [RFC6961] can be used to leverage a certificate-status protocol such as Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) [RFC6960] to check the validity of server certificates. TLS renegotiation indications defined in RFC 5746 [RFC5746] MUST be supported.…”

Section: Teap Authentication Phase 1: Tunnel Establishmentmentioning

confidence: 99%