2018
DOI: 10.17238/issn2071-2243.2018.1.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Technology of Creating Restitution Sugar Beet Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APM treatment yielded 64% genome doubling [103]. In other studies, treatment with different antimitotic compounds produced 2-4.7% doubling [79], 8.4% doubling [105], 19% [104], or doubling efficiency was not reported [16,74,83,102].…”
Section: Chemically Induced Haploid Genome Doubling In Vegetable Cropsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…APM treatment yielded 64% genome doubling [103]. In other studies, treatment with different antimitotic compounds produced 2-4.7% doubling [79], 8.4% doubling [105], 19% [104], or doubling efficiency was not reported [16,74,83,102].…”
Section: Chemically Induced Haploid Genome Doubling In Vegetable Cropsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…vulgaris (var. saccharifera)) with 20 g/L colchicine, while Vasilchenko et al ( 2018) used it at a 4000 times smaller concentration (0.005 g/L) on the same crop [16,74]. Hence, the antimitotic agent should be tested in a wide range of concentrations to determine the most effective and cost-efficient treatment protocol.…”
Section: Antimitotic Agent Choicementioning
confidence: 99%