2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The taxonomic status of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
96
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Rhipicephalus, the errors in classification were mainly due to the lack of a harmonised definition of the R. sanguineus s.l. group, which needs a re-description and the designation of a neotype of R. sanguineus s.s. (Nava et al, 2015). As a further proof of the inherent identification difficulties within the genus Rhipicephalus, no participant was able to correctly identify the adults of the neglected R. rossicus (rarely included in most books used by European tick researchers) in the first round, and only one laboratory managed a correct identification after a key containing the species was circulated among the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Rhipicephalus, the errors in classification were mainly due to the lack of a harmonised definition of the R. sanguineus s.l. group, which needs a re-description and the designation of a neotype of R. sanguineus s.s. (Nava et al, 2015). As a further proof of the inherent identification difficulties within the genus Rhipicephalus, no participant was able to correctly identify the adults of the neglected R. rossicus (rarely included in most books used by European tick researchers) in the first round, and only one laboratory managed a correct identification after a key containing the species was circulated among the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is transmitted to humans by ticks, most commonly by the species Amblyomma sculptum (formerly Amblyomma cajennense), which is considered to be the main vector of the disease in Brazil (2) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their identification down to the species level required a deeper analysis of morphologic descriptions of species belonging to this group. In fact, this has been the most controversial group within the genus Rhipicephalus (Pegram et al, 1987a) and more assembled information on both their morphological and genetic data is needed to take us closer to a consensus among the scientific community (Hekimoglu et al, 2016;Moraes-Filho et al, 2011;Nava et al, 2015). The R. sanguineus group includes 17 species (Camicas et al, 1998), so we addressed them individually, looking for candidate species descriptions suitable for these collected specimens.…”
Section: Tick Collections and Morphological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%