2016
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/l23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Supernova Impostor PSN J09132750+7627410 and Its Progenitor

Abstract: We report the results of our follow-up campaign of the supernova impostor PSN J09132750+7627410, based on optical data covering ∼ 250 d. From the beginning, the transient shows prominent narrow Balmer lines with P-Cygni profiles, with a blue-shifted absorption component becoming more prominent with time. Along the ∼ 3 months of the spectroscopic monitoring, broad components are never detected in the hydrogen lines, suggesting that these features are produced in slowly expanding material. The transient reaches … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maund et al 2006), although with fainter absolute magnitudes (M peak −14 mag, e.g. Tartaglia et al 2015Tartaglia et al , 2016. In addition, we cannot rule out a larger value of reddening in the environment of the progenitor star before explosion.…”
Section: The Progenitor Starmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Maund et al 2006), although with fainter absolute magnitudes (M peak −14 mag, e.g. Tartaglia et al 2015Tartaglia et al , 2016. In addition, we cannot rule out a larger value of reddening in the environment of the progenitor star before explosion.…”
Section: The Progenitor Starmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Perhaps the most striking example of this is in η Car, as discussed earlier in this article, but there are also a number of examples of outbursts from massive stars both in our own galaxy (such as P-Cygni), and at extragalactic distances (often termed 'supernova impostors', e.g. [168,169]). In some cases, these may even presage the subsequent supernova explosion.…”
Section: Impostors and Non-supernovaementioning
confidence: 80%
“…• We estimated an absolute magnitude for the progenitor star of M 0 F606W ≃ −12.3 mag (see Section 4), which is similar to that derived for the SN in 2010, −12.7 mag (F606W). That luminosity is more like that of a star in outburst, if we compare with SN impostors, such as UGC 2773-OT (Smith et al 2010), SNhunt248 (Kankare et al 2015), or PSN J09132750+7627410 (Tartaglia et al 2016), which all were between −13 and −14 mag; or objects in outburst, such as SNe 2009ip (e.g. Pastorello et al 2013), 2015bh (Elias-Rosa et al 2016Thöne et al 2017), or η Carinae during its Great Eruption (Humphreys et al 1999;Rest et al 2012).…”
Section: The Nature Of the Progenitor Candidatementioning
confidence: 96%