1998
The Subcutaneous Pedicle Flap in Melolabial Reconstruction
Abstract: In our experience, the subcutaneous pedicle advancement flap is often ideally suited to the reconstruction of cutaneous defects adjacent to the melolabial crease. We have been particularly satisfied with the results of this reconstructive technique when addressing deep defects adjoining the alar facial sulcus in patients with full cheeks.
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
23
8
1
1
Citation Types
0
23
0
4
Year Published
2005
2025
Publication Types
Select...
18
12
Relationship
3
27
Authors
Journals
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
References 15 publications
0
23
0
4
“…Six studies reported outcomes on V-Y advancement flaps with the number of patients ranging from 13 to 109 with a range of upper lip defect locations with and without the involvement of neighboring cosmetic unit borders. [9][10][11][12][13][14] There was a single study on ergotrid flaps for upper lateral lip defects, 15 unspecified rotational flaps for apical triangle defects, 16 melolabial rotational flaps for apical triangle defects, 17 Karapandzic flaps for lateral upper lip defects, 18 alar crescent flaps for central upper lip defects, 19 and propeller facial artery perforator flaps for lateral upper lip defects. 20 Overall, there was significant heterogeneity in the complications as well as functional and aesthetic outcomes reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies reported outcomes on V-Y advancement flaps with the number of patients ranging from 13 to 109 with a range of upper lip defect locations with and without the involvement of neighboring cosmetic unit borders. [9][10][11][12][13][14] There was a single study on ergotrid flaps for upper lateral lip defects, 15 unspecified rotational flaps for apical triangle defects, 16 melolabial rotational flaps for apical triangle defects, 17 Karapandzic flaps for lateral upper lip defects, 18 alar crescent flaps for central upper lip defects, 19 and propeller facial artery perforator flaps for lateral upper lip defects. 20 Overall, there was significant heterogeneity in the complications as well as functional and aesthetic outcomes reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,16,17,20 Patient satisfaction was greater than 90% in all studies that reported this outcome which included studies using V-Y advancement flaps, ergotrid flaps, and propeller facial artery perforator flaps. [13][14][15]20 V-Y advancement flaps in the study by Carvalho and colleagues 9 reported the highest rate of poor scarring with 4 patients (20.0%) where the upper lip defects had no limitations on location and ranged from full-thickness defects involving the vermillion border to defects involving skin and adipose tissue only. V-Y advancement flaps also reported the highest need for revision surgery by Griffin and colleagues 11 with 14 patients (46.67%) for defects involving skin and adipose tissue only and not extending greater than 5 mm laterally past the melolabial fold, although many did involve the alar and vermillion borders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A divulsão da mucosa gengival inserida na região anterior da maxila até as tuberosidades maxilares permitiu uma reconstrução da área, respeitando a cor, espessura e textura do lábio. Os retalhos locais, além de ter essa semelhança corroboram com a continência oral e o bom resultado estético, sendo desnecessário o uso de retalhos livres que muitas vezes apresentam um limite na função esfincteriana e normalmente, estão associados a reconstrução do lábio inferior (BERENHOLZ;KESSLER;SEGAL, 1999;RUSTAD et al 1988;LOPICCOLO;KOUBA, 2011;GALIMBERT, et al 2013;CERCI, 2017;HUANG et al, 2017;SPAGGIARI et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A divulsão da mucosa gengival inserida na região anterior da maxila até as tuberosidades maxilares permitiu uma reconstrução da área, respeitando a cor, espessura e textura do lábio. Os retalhos locais, além de ter essa semelhança corroboram com a continência oral e o bom resultado estético, sendo desnecessário o uso de retalhos livres que muitas vezes apresentam um limite na função esfincteriana e normalmente, estão associados a reconstrução do lábio inferior (BERENHOLZ;KESSLER;SEGAL, 1999;RUSTAD et al 1988;LOPICCOLO;KOUBA, 2011;GALIMBERT, et al 2013;CERCI, 2017;HUANG et al, 2017;SPAGGIARI et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
