1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01466.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Subcellular Distribution of Histamine, Slow‐reacting Substance and 5‐hydroxytryptamine in the Brain of the Rat

Abstract: Various extracts of brain were prepared with dilute and concentrated acid, acetone and n-butanol. When the extracts were applied to the guinea-pig isolated ileum, they produced a slow contraction which was not prevented by an antihistamine; in addition, the acid and acetone extracts inhibited the action of histamine. Histamine in extracts of brain was separated from other pharmacologically active substances by chromatography on a carboxylic-acid resin and estimated biologically. The bulk of this histamine was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shortcomings of methods and the inappropriate use of them are problems that have long beset and beclouded research on histamine and on its metabolism. Work on histamine has confirmed the truism that a method that specifically measures a substance in one biological sample may not be specific when applied to a different biological sample, as observed in some applications of the original fluorometric method for measuring histamine (Carlini and Green, 1963;Lorenz et al, 1972). Analogous problems exist in the radioenzymatic method for measuring histamine (Hegstrand and Hine, 1985;Roberts etal., 1985), e.g., the radioenzymatic method missed a large increase in urinary histamine levels that was clearly revealed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Roberts etal., 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The shortcomings of methods and the inappropriate use of them are problems that have long beset and beclouded research on histamine and on its metabolism. Work on histamine has confirmed the truism that a method that specifically measures a substance in one biological sample may not be specific when applied to a different biological sample, as observed in some applications of the original fluorometric method for measuring histamine (Carlini and Green, 1963;Lorenz et al, 1972). Analogous problems exist in the radioenzymatic method for measuring histamine (Hegstrand and Hine, 1985;Roberts etal., 1985), e.g., the radioenzymatic method missed a large increase in urinary histamine levels that was clearly revealed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Roberts etal., 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The present results do not confirm the high concentrations reported by Waalkes, Coburn & Terry (1959) or the even distribution of histamine in the rabbit brain reported by Shore, Burkhalter & Cohn (1959). The former group employed a spectrophotometric method of estimation; the latter group usd a fluorometric method, the limited specificity of which when applied to brain, has been discussed by Carlini & Green (1963) and Levine, Sato & Sjoerdsma (1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochemical measurements of histamine and its synthesizing enzyme, histidine decarboxylase, in various regions of intact and lesioned brains suggest that brain contains long axon histamine-containing neurons. Furthermore, although a considerable portion of brain histamine appears to be located in mast cells (4,7,8), its presence in synaptosomal fractions suggests its neuronal location (9)(10)(11)(12); this is supported by the presence in brain structures of adenylate cyclase activity stimulated by histamine (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%