2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2008.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sub-arborescent lycopsid genus Polysporia Newberry and its spores from the Pennsylvanian (Bolsovian–Stephanian B) continental basins of the Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lycopsids either not reported (e.g. Omphalophloios and Selaginella types) or very rare (Polysporia Newberry) in the macrofloral record (Bek et al 2008, Opluštil et al 2017. This interval also hosts the highest diversity of miospores of unknown affinity (electronic supplement 1; Figs 4, 5).…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Miospores Pollen Grains and Plants During Pennsylvanian And Early Permianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lycopsids either not reported (e.g. Omphalophloios and Selaginella types) or very rare (Polysporia Newberry) in the macrofloral record (Bek et al 2008, Opluštil et al 2017. This interval also hosts the highest diversity of miospores of unknown affinity (electronic supplement 1; Figs 4, 5).…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Miospores Pollen Grains and Plants During Pennsylvanian And Early Permianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kalibová (1960) also found abundant spores attributable to the marattialean ferns. In addition, one lycopsid, Polysporia sp., which is regarded as a peat-forming element (Bek et al 2008) (Kalibová, 1959) that are all believed to have been produced by Polysporia Newberry (Bek et al 2008). Since only a single macrofossil of Polysporia sp.…”
Section: B C D E F Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descriptions of in situ spores recovered from the fructifications of arborescent lycophytes have been published many times (e.g., Thomas 1970, Thomas and Dytko 1980, Thomas et al 2009, Drábková et al 2004, Bek and Opluštil 2006, Bek et al 2008, 2009a, b, Opluštil and Bek 2009, Bek 2012, 2013, 2017, Thomas and Bek 2014 The major problem is that there has been no distinction between Lycospora and Microspinosporites in the literature so for the purposes of this paper all comments and calculation refer to Lycospora. Schopf et al (1944), Potonié and Kremp (1954) and Somers et al (1972) mentioned a great number of Lycospora species including holotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%