2008
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of the anti‐c‐myc antibody 9E10 Fab fragment/epitope peptide complex reveals a novel binding mode dominated by the heavy chain hypervariable loops

Abstract: The X-ray structure of the Fab fragment from the anti-c-myc antibody 9E10 was determined both as complex with its epitope peptide and for the free Fab. In the complex, two Fab molecules adopt an unusual head to head orientation with the epitope peptide arranged between them. In contrast, the free Fab forms a dimer with different orientation. In the Fab/peptide complex the peptide is bound to one of the two Fabs at the "back" of its extended CDR H3, in a cleft with CDR H1, thus forming a short, three-stranded a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among ∼1,200 structures of antibody-antigen complexes in the Protein Data Bank, we found a single example, anti-C-myc antibody 9E10, that seems to exhibit antigen clasping. However, the binding mode of 9E10 conforms to the convention of anti-peptide antibodies because one Fab dominates peptide recognition by capturing the peptide into a deep cleft created with long CDRs, and this antibody showed no cooperative binding (23). By contrast, in our antibodies, two Fab molecules synergistically contribute to peptide recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Among ∼1,200 structures of antibody-antigen complexes in the Protein Data Bank, we found a single example, anti-C-myc antibody 9E10, that seems to exhibit antigen clasping. However, the binding mode of 9E10 conforms to the convention of anti-peptide antibodies because one Fab dominates peptide recognition by capturing the peptide into a deep cleft created with long CDRs, and this antibody showed no cooperative binding (23). By contrast, in our antibodies, two Fab molecules synergistically contribute to peptide recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Whereas we attached DNA handles to both ends of A2, holding A2 approximately 260 nm away from each bead and preventing nonspecific interactions, the other study attached DNA at only one end of the A2 construct. Their A2 N terminus contained a ðc-mycÞ 4 tag that directly bound an anti-c-myc antibody-coated bead, placing A2 approximately 840 nm away from the DNAbound bead but only 0-30 nm away from the ðc-mycÞ 4 tag-bound bead [depending on whether the antibody coupled through its Fab or Fc region to the bead, which of the four c-myc tags the antibody (20) bound to, and fluctuations in the flexible c-myc tags and antibody at low force]. DNA handles are not only much longer but also much stiffer than the c-myc tags.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a). This level of affinity is 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those for FLAG/antibody and c-myc/antibody (both ~400 nM K d ) (9,10) and His 6 -tag/immobilized metal (~10 µM) (11). The tag can be readily cleaved with thrombin as expected (Supplementary Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%