2008
DOI: 10.1093/lawfam/ebn011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The South African Civil Union Act 2006: Progressive Legislation With Regressive Implications?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The provisions of the Civil Union Act differ from those of the Marriage Act in two ways: first, it gives couples the option of whether they wish their union to be called a marriage or a civil partnership (de Vos, 2007, p. 461); and second, the Civil Union Act allows officers to refuse to marry same-sex couples on grounds of belief (de Vos, 2007, p. 462) 12 . While only different-sex couples may be married under the Marriage Act, the language of the Civil Union Act, which has been criticised for its poor drafting (see Smith and Robinson, 2008, p. 380), is ambiguous as to whether it is open to different-sex couples as well as same-sex couples.…”
Section: Marriage In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provisions of the Civil Union Act differ from those of the Marriage Act in two ways: first, it gives couples the option of whether they wish their union to be called a marriage or a civil partnership (de Vos, 2007, p. 461); and second, the Civil Union Act allows officers to refuse to marry same-sex couples on grounds of belief (de Vos, 2007, p. 462) 12 . While only different-sex couples may be married under the Marriage Act, the language of the Civil Union Act, which has been criticised for its poor drafting (see Smith and Robinson, 2008, p. 380), is ambiguous as to whether it is open to different-sex couples as well as same-sex couples.…”
Section: Marriage In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%