2014
DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Software Ontology (SWO): a resource for reproducibility in biomedical data analysis, curation and digital preservation

Abstract: MotivationBiomedical ontologists to date have concentrated on ontological descriptions of biomedical entities such as gene products and their attributes, phenotypes and so on. Recently, effort has diversified to descriptions of the laboratory investigations by which these entities were produced. However, much biological insight is gained from the analysis of the data produced from these investigations, and there is a lack of adequate descriptions of the wide range of software that are central to bioinformatics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did find the Software Ontology, which supports annotation of software tools by type, manufacturer, inputs, outputs, and uses. Software Ontology does not provide enough detail to model a KO and its parts …”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did find the Software Ontology, which supports annotation of software tools by type, manufacturer, inputs, outputs, and uses. Software Ontology does not provide enough detail to model a KO and its parts …”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current Bio-TDS version includes three ontologies to enable robust annotations and searching capabilities. These ontologies are: EDAM, an ontology of concepts that are prevalent within bioinformatics, including types of data, data identifiers, data formats, operations and topics (http://edamontology.org/) (22); SWO, a resource for describing analytic tools, their types, tasks, versions, data requirements and provenance (http://theswo.sourceforge.net/) (23); and NGSOnto, an ontology to describe workflows from DNA extraction to contigs in a Whole Genome Sequence experiment (http://darwin.phyloviz.net/∼msilva/NGSonto/). Attribute values within each BETS document are queried against these ontologies and the located terms are used to annotate the analytic tool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ELIXIR has based its core annotation workflow on the EDAM ontology (22). EDAM focuses only on one bioinformatics domain information representation, and does not represent some key tool development information such as version or platform which are available in the Software Ontology (SWO) (23). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 8,800 of these classes are new to ERO. Most were imported from other ontologies, e.g., the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MP) [51] and the Software Ontology (SWO) [52]. Similarly, most of the 7,727 added classes in the introduced partial-area material entity (7758) are imported from UBERON [53].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%