2017
DOI: 10.17159/2413-3221/2017/v45n1a447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The socio-economic profile of urban farming and non-farming households in the informal settlement area of the Cape Town Metropole in South Africa

Abstract: Households in the informal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The socio-economic indicators of this study area are well described in an article by Swanepoel, Van Niekerk and D'Haese (2017). As seen in Table 1, the area with the lowest mean score on the HFIAS scale is Gugulethu (10.1) and the highest average scores were measured in Bonteheuwel with a score of 16.1 and Kraaifontein with 15.9.…”
Section: Household Food Insecurity Access Scalementioning
confidence: 81%
“…The socio-economic indicators of this study area are well described in an article by Swanepoel, Van Niekerk and D'Haese (2017). As seen in Table 1, the area with the lowest mean score on the HFIAS scale is Gugulethu (10.1) and the highest average scores were measured in Bonteheuwel with a score of 16.1 and Kraaifontein with 15.9.…”
Section: Household Food Insecurity Access Scalementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Agricultural related activities are the first source of income for just over 10% of urban farming households. The above socio-economic indicators are well described in an article by Swanepoel, Van Niekerk and D'Haese (2017). Table 4 shows the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale level in relation to some livelihood characteristics.…”
Section: Household Socio-economic Demographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%