2013
DOI: 10.11591/telkomnika.v11i11.3470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Performance Evaluation Model Based on DEA and AHP Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Analytic Hierarchy Process [10], a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, is proposed by the famous American Operations Research Professor Saaty in the early 1970s. This method is more efficiently used to solve multiple complex problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Analytic Hierarchy Process [10], a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, is proposed by the famous American Operations Research Professor Saaty in the early 1970s. This method is more efficiently used to solve multiple complex problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the size of the comparison matrix (A) is n × n where n denotes the number of criteria being compared to a specific goal or parent criteria. The components of the matrix are a ij and these elements need to be transitive and reciprocal in order to make the matrix consistent (Dweiri and Faris, 2006;Qiong and Gao, 2013…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of CR determines the consistency of the judgement. The CR value of less than 0.10 is considered acceptable or else revision of the values of a ij is recommended (Dweiri and Faris, 2006;Qiong and Gao, 2013). AHP has been extensively used to resolve MCDM problems in various spheres of life.…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHP method uses the technique of "measurement through pairwise comparisons relying on the judgements of experts to derive priority scales" (Saaty, 1990;Russo and Rosaria, 2015;Al-Harbi, 2001). The computation of the AHP method consists of seven major steps as enlisted below (Kubler et al, 2016;Qiong and Gao, 2013):…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%