2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size matters? A computational tool to design bivalent ligands

Abstract: MotivationBivalent ligands are increasingly important such as for targeting G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) dimers or proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs). They contain two pharmacophoric units that simultaneously bind in their corresponding binding sites, connected with a spacer chain. Here, we report a molecular modelling tool that links the pharmacophore units via the shortest pathway along the receptors van der Waals surface and then scores the solutions providing prioritization for the design of new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This specificity is likely to be lost with the trimeric agent 21 , where the potency is in double digit micromolar region as well. Our data are similar to what has been seen in investigations of linker lengths in dimeric agents targeting G protein-coupled receptors [ 39 ], estrogen receptors [ 40 ], proteolysis targeting chimeras [ 39 ], among others [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This specificity is likely to be lost with the trimeric agent 21 , where the potency is in double digit micromolar region as well. Our data are similar to what has been seen in investigations of linker lengths in dimeric agents targeting G protein-coupled receptors [ 39 ], estrogen receptors [ 40 ], proteolysis targeting chimeras [ 39 ], among others [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“… 28 30 Furthermore, more recent in silico methods can also guide the prioritization of degraders as well as linker design that benefit from increased protein surface complementarity to reduce the time for exploring structure–activity relationships (SARs). 24 , 31 33 Combining experimental and modeling approaches to prioritize stable ternary complexes has been productive 11 but may also bias discovery of degraders toward molecules that primarily access static and long-lived populations. Thus, opportunities where sufficiently fast protein degradation occurs, such that a small fraction of ternary complex is present, could go unrecognized.…”
Section: Induced Cooperativity and Pursuit Of Privileged Ternary Complexes For Proteasomal Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach has already been shown to be effective in designing bivalent linkers for various model systems, including a PROTAC-mediated ternary complex. 59 Generally, linkers that are too long to bridge between the two pockets in a given protein-protein docked pose will coil upon themselves, whereas linkers that are too short must stretch their bonds to accomplish the bridging. These contrasting behaviors can thus conceptually be used to identify protein-protein poses that can suitably be bridged by a given PROTAC linker, resulting in a goodness-of-fit or compatibility metric between a PROTAC's linker and a given E3 ligase/target with the default MOE AMBER10:EHT forcefield.…”
Section: Validation Of Methods 4bmentioning
confidence: 99%