“…Several third-generation risk tools have been developed for general offenders (e.g., Level of Service/Case Management Inventory, Andrews, Bonta, & Wormith, 2008;OAsys, Howard, 2009); only recently, however, has research focused on third-generation instruments for sexual offenders. Examples of structured risk tools for sexual offenders that meaningfully sample criminogenic needs include STABLE-2007/ ACUTE-2007(Hanson, Harris, Scott, & Helmus, 2007; Structured Risk Assessment (Thornton, 2002a) and its variant, the Structured Assessment of Risk and Need (Webster et al, 2006); the Violence Risk Scale-Sex Offender Version (Olver, Wong, Nicholaichuk, & Gordon, 2007); the Sexual-Violence-Risk Management 20 (Boer, Hart, Kropp, & Webster, 1997); and the Sex Offender Treatment Needs and Progress Scale (McGrath & Cumming, 2003). On average, these frameworks show similar levels of predictive accuracy to static risk factor scales and, in most cases, add incremental predictive validity beyond Static-99 (Beech, Friendship, Erikson, & Hanson, 2002;Olver et al, 2007;Thornton, 2002a).…”