2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00928.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity

Abstract: Considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the remarkable fidelity with which the human auditory brainstem represents key acoustic features of the speech signal. The brainstem response to speech can be assessed noninvasively by examining scalp-recorded evoked potentials. Morphologically, two main components of the scalp-recorded brainstem response can be differentiated, a transient onset response and a sustained frequency-following response (FFR). Together, these two components are capable of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
355
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 399 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(181 reference statements)
10
355
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimulus was presented to the participant's right ear in alternating polarity at 80 ± 1 dB SPL at a rate of 10.9 Hz. Responses were online filtered from 100 to 2,000 Hz, a frequency range that captures the phase-locking limits of the inferior colliculus, the putative generator of the brainstem response (95,96). Responses were segmented into epochs (−15 to 58 ms relative to stimulus onset) and then baseline corrected to the average prestimulus amplitude.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulus was presented to the participant's right ear in alternating polarity at 80 ± 1 dB SPL at a rate of 10.9 Hz. Responses were online filtered from 100 to 2,000 Hz, a frequency range that captures the phase-locking limits of the inferior colliculus, the putative generator of the brainstem response (95,96). Responses were segmented into epochs (−15 to 58 ms relative to stimulus onset) and then baseline corrected to the average prestimulus amplitude.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency-following responses (FFRs) to tonal carriers or to the modulation envelope (envelopefollowing responses or EFRs), though still not widely used in the clinic, are rapidly gaining prominence as a means of assessing processing of complex sounds from the auditory pathway (Cunningham et al 2001;Aiken and Picton 2008;Swaminathan et al 2008;Basu et al 2010;Clinard et al 2010;Krishnan et al 2010;Parbery-Clark et al 2011;Anderson et al 2012). FFRs and EFRs are evoked in response to longer, often more spectro-temporally complex stimuli (Krishnan 1999(Krishnan , 2002Krishnan et al 2004;Swaminathan et al 2008), and are strongly influenced by rostral brainstem and midbrain generators (Kiren et al 1994;Kuwada et al 2002;Akhoun et al 2010;Chandrasekaran and Kraus 2010;Parthasarathy and Bartlett 2012). They have been used to show differences in processing of complex stimuli under various pathological conditions, such as age-related hearing loss, dyslexia, and autism (McAnally and Stein 1997;Chandrasekaran et al 2009;Russo et al 2009;Anderson et al 2012;Clinard and Tremblay 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests abnormal temporal phase-locking properties to the fundamental frequency and its harmonics of the voiced (vowel) portion of the /da/ stimuli. This may relate to the neural deficiency of the brainstem level as brainstem cells are responsible for originating these responses [30] . Recent investigations towards the aging effect on S-ABR have been suggestive of delayed FFR responses along with altered onset and offset responses [29] .…”
Section: Effect Of Diabetes On Sustained Measures Of Speech-evoked Abmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] These frequency following responses (FFR) do not seem to be affected due to various disorders in spite of delayed transient responses [18] . However, latency analysis of the FFR in diabetic individuals was shown to be prolonged along with the onset and offset representations (V-A complex and O, respectively).…”
Section: Effect Of Diabetes On Sustained Measures Of Speech-evoked Abmentioning
confidence: 99%