The role of transport flexibility in logistics provision

Abstract

Purpose -This paper aims to develop a framework that rationalises transport flexibility into different types. In this way the role of the flexibility types in delivering specific strategic logistics outcomes can be determined. Design/methodology/approach -The authors undertake a synthesis of available literature related to flexibility to determine what types of transport flexibility are required and when. Findings -Twelve definitions and key components of transport flexibility are identified. These signify a proactive approach to the consideration of the subject within the context of a collaborative approach to relationships between carrier, supplier and customer. Research limitations/implications -This is a conceptual study developing definitions and models for transport flexibility. While these frameworks have been formed within the context of the literature, further research to determine the application of the model will need to be undertaken, to examine the benefits and costs associated with various degrees of flexibility. Practical implications -While the definitions and models are conceptual, they are important as generic templates by which carriers may develop a logistics strategy, determining their competitive offering and hence defining their flexibility capabilities. They may then determine the degree of collaboration necessary. The results of this paper also inform further empirical research into the area of transport and logistics flexibility. Originality/value -There is little research that addresses the issue of transport flexibility from a logistics perspective. Thus, there is originality in developing a framework that rationalises transport flexibility into different types. This will provide a foundation by which carriers and shippers may develop collaborative and information technology strategies.

Analysis of the skilled work force effect on the logistics performance index—case study from India

“…al [49], Naim et. al [32] Ease with which the system can respond to uncertainty and quick response Safety Cantor [7] A system which is less prone to accidents, damages and other losses Profit Stapleton et. al [41], Randall et.…”

Improving efficiencies in logistics operations by converging tangible & intangible aspects

“…As the average length of the logistics operations increases the inefficiencies leading to delays gets amplified and affects the delivery process (Naim et al, 2006). The delivery process also gets delayed if the fleet capacity is insufficient, which causes disruptions in the logistics operations (Fowkes et al, 2004).…”

Defining and measuring the network flexibility of humanitarian supply chains: insights from the 2015 Nepal earthquake

“…To show this, we implement our framework on a real case, the 2015 Nepal earthquake response, and discuss the implications of results for both theory and practice. (Moon et al 2012) Fleet (F) To change planned or assumed fleets (Slack 2005) Delivery (D) To change planned or assumed delivery dates (Slack 2005) Trans-shipment (T) To move stock between local supplier and demand locations where physical distances between them are small (Grigore 2007) Access and routing (AR) To provide intensive distribution coverage (Naim et al 2006) Information systems (ISF) IT support (IT) To use IT as support for material and information flow control (Moon et al 2012) Information databases (ID) To have means to store and aggregate data (Moon et al 2012) Decision support systems (DSS) To have access to systems that can assist decision-making (Baharmand et al 2015) Resources (RF) Human resources (HR) To have access to human resources with relevant qualifications (Krajewski et al 2005) Local partners (LP) To have local NGOs as operational partners (Santarelli et al 2015) 3 Research design Our paper aims at developing a comparable quantitative measure of HSC flexibility which can help to identify improvement strategies. Our research design follows Bourne et al (2000) who propose four steps for developing a performance measurement system: (a) system design; (b) implementation of measures; (c) use of measures to assess the implementation strategy; and (d) use of measures to challenge strategy.…”