2009
The role of subjective time in identity regulation
Abstract: We explore the function of subjective perceptions of time in regulating personal identity. Events that reflect favourably on the self feel more recent than events that reflect negatively on the self. We propose that this systematic bias in subjective time judgment serves an identity regulation function: These biases allow people to maintain a favourable evaluation of current self. Recent events are likely to be judged as 'belonging' to the current self and thus incorporated into current identity. Distant event…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
43
3
2
0
Citation Types
2
42
0
1
Year Published
2009
2026
Publication Types
Select...
36
5
3
2
Relationship
4
42
Authors
Journals
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
References 62 publications
2
42
0
1
“…For example, our results are consistent with other findings showing that everyday life events of university students are typically in the low to medium range of arousal reactivity (e.g., Myrtek, Aschenbrenner, & Brügner, 2005), and that this group experiences and reports disproportionally more positive, as opposed to negative, events (e.g., Brewer, 1988;Finnbogadóttir & Berntsen, 2011). This is in line with work suggesting that most biases in AM favor positive information (see Alicke & Sedikides, 2009;Conway, 2005;Rasmussen & Berntsen, 2009;Wilson, Gunn, & Ross, 2009) as it likely plays a more central role in the autobiographical knowledge that helps us define ourselves in the present (cf. Salgado & Berntsen, 2019).…”
Section: Implications For Theories Of Emotion and Amsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, our results are consistent with other findings showing that everyday life events of university students are typically in the low to medium range of arousal reactivity (e.g., Myrtek, Aschenbrenner, & Brügner, 2005), and that this group experiences and reports disproportionally more positive, as opposed to negative, events (e.g., Brewer, 1988;Finnbogadóttir & Berntsen, 2011). This is in line with work suggesting that most biases in AM favor positive information (see Alicke & Sedikides, 2009;Conway, 2005;Rasmussen & Berntsen, 2009;Wilson, Gunn, & Ross, 2009) as it likely plays a more central role in the autobiographical knowledge that helps us define ourselves in the present (cf. Salgado & Berntsen, 2019).…”
Section: Implications For Theories Of Emotion and Amsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although the actual time that had elapsed between the event and the time of the study was the same across conditions, participants in the "close" condition rated their past and present selves similarly, while participants in the "distant" condition rated their current selves more positively than their past selves. These findings are consistent with the notion that a sense of subjective distance from past events may maintain the individual"s perception that they are improving and developing over time (see also Wilson, Gunn, & Ross, 2009)..…”
Section: Subjective Distancesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In fact, prior research suggests a contrasting view: selfesteem can be enhanced by the belief that the self is discontinuous and that it has changed in positive ways. In particular, psychologically distancing the present self from negative past life experiences is self-enhancing (Wilson & Ross, 2003;Wilson et al, 2009). Our findings suggest that the experience of systematically reviewing one's life and identifying, describing, and conceptually linking life chapters may serve to enhance the self, even in the absence of increased self-concept clarity and meaning.…”
Section: Life Stories and Self-esteemmentioning
confidence: 75%
