2003
DOI: 10.1108/01443570310471839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of socio‐cultural, political‐legal, economic, and educational dimensions in quality management

Abstract: Quality management practices have recently flourished across the globe. In this research we review and integrate the literature by identifying and organizing significant research findings, and develop a conceptual model of the relationships between international environmental conditions (e.g. socio‐cultural, political‐legal, economic, and educational factors) and dimensions of quality management (e.g. strategic quality planning, customer focus and satisfaction, human resource development and management, inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
(155 reference statements)
1
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant environmental variables include organizational uncertainty (Reed et al, 1996); dynamism, munificence and complexity (Fuentes-Fuentes, Albacete-Sáez, & Lloréns-Montes, 2004); and international competition (Das et al, 2000;Handfield, Ghosh, & Fawcett, 1998). Likewise, the QM literature has given little treatment to the possible influence of the sector's structural characteristics on the results of firms that have implemented QM (Prasad & Tata, 2003). The study by Benson, Saraph, and Schroeder (1991) is one of the first to consider the effects of a set of contextual variables on quality management.…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Relevant environmental variables include organizational uncertainty (Reed et al, 1996); dynamism, munificence and complexity (Fuentes-Fuentes, Albacete-Sáez, & Lloréns-Montes, 2004); and international competition (Das et al, 2000;Handfield, Ghosh, & Fawcett, 1998). Likewise, the QM literature has given little treatment to the possible influence of the sector's structural characteristics on the results of firms that have implemented QM (Prasad & Tata, 2003). The study by Benson, Saraph, and Schroeder (1991) is one of the first to consider the effects of a set of contextual variables on quality management.…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Dale has also same thinking for senior management that they are the key initiators of Quality revolution which is termed as second industrial revolution by Kanji. For TQM, the employee and leadership participation is most determinant concepts (Prasad et al 2003). In petroleum sector motivation level and organization citizenship is fluctuating among the employees of different companies.…”
Section: Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, economic conditions such as high turnover can affect the diffusion of internally related as well as externally related lean practices by causing loss of transferred knowledge, which can even threatening the sustainability of a project (e.g., Mefford and Bruun 1998;Wallace 2004;Hofer et al 2011). According to Prasad and Tata (2003), it is crucial to provide a thorough understanding of the various socio-cultural, politicallegal, economic, and educational factors that can affect internationalisation of best practices so as to define how effectively manage and take advantage of the unique conditions of each country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first important step towards integrating studies on internationalisation of lean manufacturing was done by Prasad and Tata (2003). However, they failed in providing a comprehensive view of the phenomenon since their focus was specifically directed towards a sub-bundle of lean practices (i.e., customer focus and satisfaction, strategic quality planning, human resource development and management, information and analysis, management of process quality).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%