2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07956-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of shadow economies in ecological footprint quality: empirical evidence from Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies in the previous literature explored the linkage between shadow economy and environmental pollution. These studies found a positive association between shadow economy and environmental pollution, for example, Biswas et al (2012), Elgin and Oztunali (2014), Hille (2018), Chen et al (2018a, b), Köksal et al (2020), and Pang et al (2020). According to the previously mentioned literature, due to the existence of the shadow economy, the environmental standard is lax in these countries, and therefore the firms take the advantage of these lax environmental standards and produce different products without taking care of environmental standards, and therefore it brings an increase in air pollution in these countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies in the previous literature explored the linkage between shadow economy and environmental pollution. These studies found a positive association between shadow economy and environmental pollution, for example, Biswas et al (2012), Elgin and Oztunali (2014), Hille (2018), Chen et al (2018a, b), Köksal et al (2020), and Pang et al (2020). According to the previously mentioned literature, due to the existence of the shadow economy, the environmental standard is lax in these countries, and therefore the firms take the advantage of these lax environmental standards and produce different products without taking care of environmental standards, and therefore it brings an increase in air pollution in these countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this regard, Pang et al (2019) explored the association between the shadow economy and air pollution for three Chinese provinces, and the empirical results confirm that the shadow economy is the most important source of an increase in air pollution. In the same perspective, Köksal et al (2020) explored the association between shadow economy and ecological footprints for the case of Turkey during the time period from 1961 to 2014. The results of the study confirmed that in the long run, shadow economy plays a positive role in surging up the ecological footprints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first view is about the transformation of the capitalist system; the second view focuses on the sixth Kondratieff wave, and the third view is related to green growth. Following the literature on Turkey that used various factors, such as financial development (Ozturk and Acaravci, 2013;Katircioğlu ve Taspinar, 2017), urbanization and industrialization (Pata, 2018a(Pata, , 2018b(Pata, , 2018c, income inequality (Uzar and Eyuboglu, 2019), shadow economy (Köksal et al 2020), hydropower energy (Pata and Aydin, 2020), renewable energy (Sharif et al 2020), and information and communications technologies (Barış-Tüzemen et al 2020), we add output volatility as another factor and find evidence in favor of the EKC hypothesis. After determining the long-run relationship between output volatility and CO 2 , we run the restricted ECM to measure the short-run relationship using the ARDL (2,1,1,4) model.…”
Section: The Findings Of the Ardl Bounds Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of most of the studies support the EKC hypothesis (see Lise, 2006;Yavuz, 2014;Shahbaz et al, 2013;Tutulmaz, 2015;Bölük and Mert, 2015), whereas some of them do not support the EKC hypothesis (see Lise and Montfort, 2007;Akbostancı et al, 2009;Ozturk and Acaravci, 2010;Katircioğlu and Katircioğlu,2018a). Aside economic growth, a large part of the literature focuses on the relationship between carbon emission and other factors, such as agriculture (Dogan, 2016), foreign direct investment (Balibey, 2015;Seker et al, 2015;Gökmenoğlu and Taspinar, 2016), tourism (Vita et al, 2015), trade openness (Halicioglu, 2009;Ertugrul et al, 2016;Ozatac, 2017;Pata 2019), export product diversification (Gozgor and Can, 2016), fiscal policy (Katircioglu and Katircioglu, 2018b), financial development (Ozturk and Acaravci, 2013;Katircioğlu and Taspinar, 2017), urbanization and industrialization (Pata, 2018a(Pata, , 2018b(Pata, , 2018c, income inequality (Uzar and Eyuboglu, 2019), shadow economy (Köksal et al 2020), hydropower energy (Pata and Aydin, 2020), renewable energy (Sharif et al 2020), as well as information and communications technologies (Barış-Tüzemen et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, urbanism and entire population of the world have been involved in the research results for comparison aims as well. Koksal, Işik and Katircioğlu [10] state that developed economies concentrate more on light manufacturing industries including apparel, leather, wood, metal products and agribusiness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%