The role of self-monitoring in adolescents’ susceptibility to passive peer pressure

Perrine, Nicholas; Aloise-Young, Patricia A.

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.005

Cited by 42 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Participants reported to what extent each item was descriptive of them using the previous 5-point response scale. The reliability coefficient found in our sample (α =.64) is acceptable and consistent with those found in other studies using the same scale (Graziano et al 1987; Guidetti, Cavazza, and Conner, Social influence processes on adolescents' food likes and consumption: the role of parental authoritativeness and individual self-monitoring, in revision; Howells and Fishfader 1995;Perrine and Aloise-Young 2004). Higher scores correspond to higher self-monitoring.…”

Section: Measures and Proceduressupporting

confidence: 90%

Who Cares for Reputation? Individual Differences and Concern for Reputation

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reputation is highly important within groups as it provides a number of benefits, both instrumental (including access to valuable resources and the likelihood to influence others) and symbolic ones (e.g., satisfaction of fundamental esteem needs). In the present paper, we proposed and found that the degree to which people are concerned about their reputation is sensitive to personality differences. We found evidence that prevention focus and others’ approval as contingency of self-worth predict concern for reputation via self-monitoring orientation (mediation model). Results are discussed in terms of reputation management, and future research avenues are proposed

show abstract

Section: Measures and Proceduressupporting

confidence: 90%

Who Cares for Reputation? Individual Differences and Concern for Reputation

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Peer pressure is one of the most influential pressures, especially on youth towards their behavior (Perrine and Aloise-Young, 2004). The pressure of the society indeed had great impact on our respondents to own and be dependent on smartphones, even for those with a low monthly salary.…”

Section: Antecedents Of Dependencymentioning

confidence: 95%

Smartphone Dependency and Its Impact on Purchase Behavior

Harun¹,

Liew²,

Kassim³

et al. 2015

ASS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People nowadays seem to become dependent towards smartphone due to its convenience, great camera features, easy applications' installations, and more importantly, it can do most of the computer functions on the go. Significantly, smartphone usage in Malaysia is growing enormously and has become a significant and lucrative industry. This study aims to understand the antecedents and the outcome of the smartphone dependency among smartphone consumers. Two theories -the theory of uses and gratification and the media dependency theorywere used as the theoretical basis for this study, in order to determine the motivations to use a smartphone and to define dependency and its outcome. The antecedent variables were convenience, social need and social influence; and all of these dimensions are conceptualized as one-dimensional. The outcome of dependency on smartphones was expected to be the purchase behavior. Data analyses were based on 226 valid questionnaires that were collected among smartphone users. The result from the Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Partial Least Square (PLS) shows that only social needs and social influence significantly influenced the smartphone dependency among consumers, therefore indicating that these two factors are important to influence dependency on the smartphone. In addition, the analysis also verifies that the purchase behavior is the outcome of the dependency on the smartphone. Based on these results, marketers could focus on creating dependency among consumers on smartphone usage based on the consumers' social need, which eventually will promote future purchase behavior in the long run. More importantly, understanding social influences as antecedents Keywords: dependency on smartphone, purchase behavior, theory of uses and gratification, theory of media dependency

show abstract

“…All scores are then added together to compute an overall self-monitoring score. High selfmonitors are these individuals who give close attention to social cues and change their behavior to fit the different situation, however, low self-monitors are these individuals who relatively insensitive to social cues and do not modify their behavior to fit different situations (Baumeister and Twenge 2003;Perrine and Aloise-Young 2004).…”

Section: Self-monitoring Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Macro and micro structures in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex contribute to individual differences in self-monitoring

Yang

Tian

Wei

et al. 2015

Brain Imaging and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Individual differences in self-monitoring, which are the capability to adjust behavior to adapt to social situations, influence a wide range of social behaviors. However, understanding of focal differences in brain structures related to individual self-monitoring is minimal, particularly when micro and macro structures are considered simultaneously. The present study investigates the relationship between self-monitoring and brain structure in a relatively large sample of young adults. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) revealed a significant positive correlation between self-monitoring and gray matter volume in the dorsal cingulate anterior cortex (dACC), dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and bilateral ventral striatum (VS). Further analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between self-monitoring and white matter (WM) integrity, as indexed by fractional anisotropy (FA) in the anterior cingulum (ACG) bundle. Moreover, there was a significant positive correlation between self-monitoring and mean radius diffusion (RD). These results shed light on the structural neural basis of variation in self-monitoring.

show abstract

The role of self-monitoring in adolescents’ susceptibility to passive peer pressure

Cited by 42 publications

References 44 publications

Who Cares for Reputation? Individual Differences and Concern for Reputation

Who Cares for Reputation? Individual Differences and Concern for Reputation

Smartphone Dependency and Its Impact on Purchase Behavior

Macro and micro structures in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex contribute to individual differences in self-monitoring

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About