1989
DOI: 10.1021/j100360a027 View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
|

Abstract: electrostatic interaction will be too weak to influence this. In this case it would be expected that the Cu2+ will locate much closer to one27A1 to achieve some charge compensation. However, there is likely a distribution of Al-Al distances. At low exchange Cu2+ preferentially picks those sites with the shortest Al-Al distances since it must exchange for two monovalent ions. However, even these distances must be greater than about 1.0 nm (out of a 1,9-nm average) for no 27A1 modulation to be observed since the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance
Select...
1
15
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals