2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of intramedullary fixation in ankle fractures – A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, some of the SF-36 scales in our series trended even higher than in the normative patient population. The safety data recorded in this study are also in line with recent publications reporting relatively low complication rates associated with the use of a locked intramedullary fibular nail [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Surprisingly, some of the SF-36 scales in our series trended even higher than in the normative patient population. The safety data recorded in this study are also in line with recent publications reporting relatively low complication rates associated with the use of a locked intramedullary fibular nail [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The use of modern fibular locking nails for unstable ankle fractures is gaining popularity due to its load sharing and rotationally stable properties. [23][24][25][26] In the past decade, there is a growing body of evidence to support its use, particularly in elderly patients who have a compromised soft tissue envelope that may be at risk with traditional fixation. [26][27][28][29] This study reviewed the outcome following ankle fracture treatment with the FRS in a non-designer level I major trauma setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The option of internal fixation was based on factors such as fractures' state, comorbidity, and skin condition. Theoretically, a locking plate has a potential advantage in osteoporotic bone, provides sufficient strength to resist pullout, and this fixation allows screws to improve the stability of construction and facilitate bridging fixation, helping to maintain the reduced calcaneus morphology (29,30). In particular, the locking plate is fit for Sanders type II and III fractures (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%