1987
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of frequency in the effects of long‐term intermittent stimulation of denervated slow‐twitch muscle in the rat.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Rat soleus muscle was denervated by sciatic transection and electrically stimulated for periods of between 3 and 9 weeks with intermittent 1 s bursts of pulses. Most of the bursts were either repeated every 90 s and pulses within them had frequencies between 10 and 100 Hz, or had a frequency of 50 Hz and were repeated at intervals between 60 and 600 s. Comparisons were made with continuous stimulation at 10 Hz.2. At the end of the period of stimulation, isometric twitches and tetani were measured and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slowing of the contraction is the most commonly reported change; it develops few days after denervation, is more marked in fast than in slow muscles, and is also longerlasting in fast than in slow muscles. In slow muscles, a reversal of the Wrst eVects may occur several weeks after denervation, with a shortening of contraction time (Al-Amood and Lewis 1987Lewis , 1989, which explains the speeding eVect of long-term denervation described by others in slow (Syrový et al 1971(Syrový et al , 1972 or mixed (Carraro et al 1982) muscles. There are species diVerences, e.g.…”
Section: Changes In Dynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The slowing of the contraction is the most commonly reported change; it develops few days after denervation, is more marked in fast than in slow muscles, and is also longerlasting in fast than in slow muscles. In slow muscles, a reversal of the Wrst eVects may occur several weeks after denervation, with a shortening of contraction time (Al-Amood and Lewis 1987Lewis , 1989, which explains the speeding eVect of long-term denervation described by others in slow (Syrový et al 1971(Syrový et al , 1972 or mixed (Carraro et al 1982) muscles. There are species diVerences, e.g.…”
Section: Changes In Dynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other mechanisms than a lower T m may be responsible for the paradoxical findings in muscles of SCI subjects [1,4]. For example, possible alterations in the excitation-contraction coupling mechanisms may have caused the increase in the relative twitch tension, which was also found in denervated muscles [36], and consequently may determine the relatively high forces during low-frequency stimulation in the SCI individuals ( Figure 3). …”
Section: Force-frequency Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3,4,53,56,59,100 The pattern of stimulation used to transform a denervated slow-twitch muscle into a faster muscle resembles that normally delivered by the motor nerve to a fast-twitch muscle, namely intermittent trains of high-frequency activity. The disadvantage of this model is that denervationand stimulation-induced changes overlap, 3 not to mention the technical difficulties of efficiently stimulating a denervated muscle.…”
Section: Why Chronic Low-frequency Stimulation?mentioning
confidence: 99%