2018
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research

Abstract: The power of citizen science to contribute to both science and society is gaining increased recognition, particularly in physics and biology. Although there is a long history of public engagement in agriculture and food science, the term ‘citizen science’ has rarely been applied to these efforts. Similarly, in the emerging field of citizen science, most new citizen science projects do not focus on food or agriculture. Here, we convened thought leaders from a broad range of fields related to citizen science, ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Ryan et al . ). Our study focused on a large‐scale citizen‐science program in Argentina; as of now, such studies are a rarity in the Southern Hemisphere (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; Ryan et al . ). Our study focused on a large‐scale citizen‐science program in Argentina; as of now, such studies are a rarity in the Southern Hemisphere (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Citizen science can improve data collection for research and consequently can deliver social, economic, and ecological benefits (Conrad and Hilchey 2011; Theobald et al 2015;Ryan et al 2018). Our study focused on a large-scale citizenscience program in Argentina; as of now, such studies are a rarity in the Southern Hemisphere (Figure 1).…”
Section: Lessons Learned and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the total valid response cohort of 110 researchers, 23 different areas of the life sciences were identified as primary research areas ( figure 1A); with a median of 5 respondents per research area (range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Respondents were overwhelmingly laboratory-based at a university or research institute (n=99 (90.8%); Fig 1B).…”
Section: Research Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the life sciences, narrowing the gap between research production and research use is a key challenge. There is increasing evidence that public involvement and stakeholder engagement is key to achieving impact and true provision and use of scientific knowledge for the benefit of society [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%