1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.599ac.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of capsaicin‐sensitive muscle afferents in fatigue‐induced modulation of the monosynaptic reflex in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example H-reflexes evoked in ankle plantarflexors are depressed after fatigue (Garland and McComas, 1990;Garland, 1991;Loscher et al, 1996;Walton et al, 2002;Kuchinad et al, 2004). We suggested previously that the discrepancy between results based on the H-reflex and that for the CMEP in elbow flexors (Butler et al, 2003) could be attributable to presynaptic inhibition of group Ia afferent volleys by group III and IV muscle afferents (Pettorossi et al, 1999;Rossi et al, 1999;Rudomin and Schmidt, 1999). The current results suggest that differences in the behavior of flexors and extensors may also contribute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example H-reflexes evoked in ankle plantarflexors are depressed after fatigue (Garland and McComas, 1990;Garland, 1991;Loscher et al, 1996;Walton et al, 2002;Kuchinad et al, 2004). We suggested previously that the discrepancy between results based on the H-reflex and that for the CMEP in elbow flexors (Butler et al, 2003) could be attributable to presynaptic inhibition of group Ia afferent volleys by group III and IV muscle afferents (Pettorossi et al, 1999;Rossi et al, 1999;Rudomin and Schmidt, 1999). The current results suggest that differences in the behavior of flexors and extensors may also contribute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…First, they may inhibit group Ia terminals pre- synaptically and thus disfacilitate motoneurons (Pettorossi et al, 1999;Rossi et al, 1999). However, other factors could counteract such effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the stimulus was adjusted to three to five times the motor threshold (0.1-millisecond pulse duration). The gastrocnemius muscle was subjected to repetitive, fatiguing, tetanic stimulations with an increasing number of trains (1,3,6,12,30, and 60, for a total of 112 stimulations at 60-second intervals) at an 85-Hz fusion frequency (600-millisecond duration, 1-second intervals) in isometric conditions (28). The following measurements were made and compared between groups: peak tetanic force, isometric speed, and fatigability of the muscle (fatigue index).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, group III/IV afferents have inhibitory effects on spinal motoneurons during intense exercise and with prolonged fatiguing exercise they also inhibit corticospinal drive, a phenomenon known as central fatigue (reduction of motor output) [325]. In addition, capsaicin-sensitive afferents have an inhibitory effect on the monosynaptic reflex [326] which constitutes a substantial component of total neural drive to the muscle during walking. For the human soleus muscle, primary afferent feedback has been estimated to account for 30-60% of motoneuronal excitability [327].…”
Section: Consideration Of the Physiological Role Of Group III And Iv mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors argue that the decrease in muscle spindle sensitivity is due to an increased compliance of the muscle (including the intrafusal fibers which are the end organs of the Ia afferents). Another possible explanation is that stretching resulted in the activation of nociceptive afferents which have been shown to reduce the excitability of the monosynaptic reflex through pre-synaptic inhibition of Ia afferent terminals within the spinal cord [326,356]. Stretching has been also reported to decrease H-reflex [357] or other reflex-based measures of motoneuronal excitability [110,358] in patients with spasticity, however, others found no effect on the excitability of H-reflex [359].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Stretch-induced Strength Loss and Its Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%