2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of complications in our study is comparable to that reported for diaphyseal femur fractures in the elderly [18,25,26] . Fortunately, our small cohorts achieved union, both clinically and radiologically, and regained a similar level of function post-operatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate of complications in our study is comparable to that reported for diaphyseal femur fractures in the elderly [18,25,26] . Fortunately, our small cohorts achieved union, both clinically and radiologically, and regained a similar level of function post-operatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There are several surgical options, such as an angled blade plate, a locking plate or retrograde intramedullary nailing. In biomechanical studies, intramedullary nails showed significantly higher stiffness and significantly lower micromotion across the fracture gap with axial compression than when using locked plates [7,17,18] . Therefore, intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures provides a stable fixation construct that can be applied using indirect reduction techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These nonunions required revision surgery and, in a number of cases, more than two revision surgeries, which further compromised the soft tissues. Additionally, there has yet to be a report in the literature of prosthetic infection rates substantially greater than those seen with ORIF in this subset of patients [16]. In this small cohort, the high rates of persistent nonunion, reoperation, and infection make ORIF the more dangerous procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[22][23][24][25] In a systematic review of the literature by Papadokostakis et al, [24] it was concluded that retrograde IM nailing was a reliable treatment method with less complications for distal femoral fractures, while similar judgments were made by Handolin et al [25] Retrograde IM nails have been shown to achieve good results in osteoporotic bone as well. [22,23] The study of Zlowodzki et al [26] discussed that Less Invasive Stabilization System provided improved distal fixation compared to the retrograde nail in osteoporotic bones because of higher axial loads, load to failure and a lower incidence of fixation failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%