2020
DOI: 10.1002/nur.22015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“The right place and the right time”: A qualitative study of the decision‐making process of self‐initiated HIV testing among young adults

Abstract: Young adults continue to have very low rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing, which contribute to transmission, late diagnoses, and poor health outcomes. The access and uptake of HIV testing among young adults can be improved by promoting self‐initiated testing (i.e., testing without the immediate recommendation of a clinician). Little is known, however, about how young adults self‐initiate HIV testing. The purpose of this study was to explore the decision‐making process of young adults who self‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, whether HIV testing is passive due to the requirement of research participation, PrEP candidacy evaluation, or financial incentives (i.e., passive HIV testing); more importantly, whether the HIV testing decision is actively made due to the influence of recent sexual exposure to HIV (i.e., exposure-influenced HIV testing). Passive and active (i.e., exposure-influenced) HIV testing can have substantially varying utilities for HIV detection because the latter is more likely to capture individuals with the highest probabilities of HIV seroconversion, particularly for those who are PrEP/PEP-naïve [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. While engaging YMSM in passive HIV testing regardless of sexual risks is a vital strategy for detecting new HIV infections, strategies and resources should also be prioritized to educate and promote exposure-influenced HIV testing among high-risk YMSM, which is essential to bolster US CDC′s overarching HIV testing guidelines and objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, whether HIV testing is passive due to the requirement of research participation, PrEP candidacy evaluation, or financial incentives (i.e., passive HIV testing); more importantly, whether the HIV testing decision is actively made due to the influence of recent sexual exposure to HIV (i.e., exposure-influenced HIV testing). Passive and active (i.e., exposure-influenced) HIV testing can have substantially varying utilities for HIV detection because the latter is more likely to capture individuals with the highest probabilities of HIV seroconversion, particularly for those who are PrEP/PEP-naïve [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. While engaging YMSM in passive HIV testing regardless of sexual risks is a vital strategy for detecting new HIV infections, strategies and resources should also be prioritized to educate and promote exposure-influenced HIV testing among high-risk YMSM, which is essential to bolster US CDC′s overarching HIV testing guidelines and objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%