1983
DOI: 10.2307/2425509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Response of Fishes to Periodic Spring Floods in a Southeastern Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
141
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, benthic species were important in determining assemblage structure during the dry season, whereas water column species were more important during the wet season. There are several ecologically plausible explanations for this pattern including: fish moved out of the study area to seek refuge from high wet season flows (Ross and Baker 1983;Winemiller and Jepsen 1998); reproductive activity was stimulated by flooding and species migrated out of the study area to find suitable habitats for spawning and recruitment (Orr and Milward 1984;Pusey et al 1995b); food availability was reduced by wet season habitat disturbance and fish moved in order to target their preferred prey items (particularly aquatic invertebrates, which are highly sensitive to substrate disturbance (Rabeni and Minshall 1977;Pusey et al 1995b;Winemiller and Jepsen 1998;Bishop et al 2001;Kennard et al 2001)); and/or biotic controls partly determined community structure (e.g. predation or competition for habitat, especially during the dry season (Hoeinghaus et al 2003)).…”
Section: Temporal Variability In Fish Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, benthic species were important in determining assemblage structure during the dry season, whereas water column species were more important during the wet season. There are several ecologically plausible explanations for this pattern including: fish moved out of the study area to seek refuge from high wet season flows (Ross and Baker 1983;Winemiller and Jepsen 1998); reproductive activity was stimulated by flooding and species migrated out of the study area to find suitable habitats for spawning and recruitment (Orr and Milward 1984;Pusey et al 1995b); food availability was reduced by wet season habitat disturbance and fish moved in order to target their preferred prey items (particularly aquatic invertebrates, which are highly sensitive to substrate disturbance (Rabeni and Minshall 1977;Pusey et al 1995b;Winemiller and Jepsen 1998;Bishop et al 2001;Kennard et al 2001)); and/or biotic controls partly determined community structure (e.g. predation or competition for habitat, especially during the dry season (Hoeinghaus et al 2003)).…”
Section: Temporal Variability In Fish Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of short-term (i.e., <1 year) flood impacts is particularly sparse (Jurajda et al 2006) as most studies of this scale are conducted in small coldwater streams (Gerking 1950;Lobon-Cervi a 1996) and medium-sized rivers (Ross & Baker 1983;Matthews 1986). Floods increased the probability of fish entrainment into the interior SacramentoÀ San Joaquin River delta (Perry et al 2015) and caused sediment erosion and associated physicochemical changes (e.g., low water transparency and dissolved oxygen) that reduced fish production and abundance in the Niger River delta (Akankali & Jamabo 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During floods, habitat selection by fish in Midwestern rivers have been grouped by preference guilds consisting of flood-exploitative species that move onto inundated floodplain and flood-quiescent species that remain in the channel with reduced activity [183,184]. The spatial arrangement of flow refuge within a watershed, and in particular in floodplain areas, appears to be essential for resilience and recovery of fish communities from natural flow disturbances [185][186][187].…”
Section: Applied Ecological Concepts At the Mesohabitat Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downstream-directed velocities are swift within this habitat unit creating a harsh environmental for many fish species [181][182][183]. Spatially, this high-flow habitat unit overlies with the bed topography elements at the low-flow stages consisting of following habitat units: the four pool units, scour pool, the two riffles, and glide ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Mesohabitat Units At High-flow Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%