2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-015-2809-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of single precision computations in the simulation of deep soil heat diffusion in a land surface model

Abstract: of single precision. There is thus a clear danger of using single precision in some climate model applications, in particular any scientifically meaningful study of deep soil permafrost must at least use double precision. In addition, climate modelling teams might well benefit from paying more attention to numerical precision and roundoff issues to offset the potentially more frequent numerical anomalies in future large-scale parallel climate applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The worst-case scenario for precision loss is if one of the numbers is much smaller than the other, when the loss of precision can be total, meaning all the non-zero bits in the smaller number's significand are lost and the result of the addition will simply be the larger number. Harvey and Verseghy (2016) identify this as the reason their model fails to represent deep soil temperatures when using 32-bit arithmetic. Harvey and Verseghy (2016) propose that the climate and weather modelling community avoid this potential problem by always using double, or even higher precision.…”
Section: Low Precision For Land Surface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The worst-case scenario for precision loss is if one of the numbers is much smaller than the other, when the loss of precision can be total, meaning all the non-zero bits in the smaller number's significand are lost and the result of the addition will simply be the larger number. Harvey and Verseghy (2016) identify this as the reason their model fails to represent deep soil temperatures when using 32-bit arithmetic. Harvey and Verseghy (2016) propose that the climate and weather modelling community avoid this potential problem by always using double, or even higher precision.…”
Section: Low Precision For Land Surface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harvey and Verseghy (2016) identify this as the reason their model fails to represent deep soil temperatures when using 32-bit arithmetic. Harvey and Verseghy (2016) propose that the climate and weather modelling community avoid this potential problem by always using double, or even higher precision. They mention that the use of extended precision (128-bit, and even 256-bit arithmetic) is becoming more common for computations in other scientific disciplines, and that climate modelling should also be following this trend towards higher precision.…”
Section: Low Precision For Land Surface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations