2021
DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2021.2019368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of palpatory examinations for pelvic landmarks to determine pelvic asymmetry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooperstein and Hickey [22] systematically reviewed studies of PSIS palpation and reported that their QAREL quality score was only 46% [44]. Mine et al [25] even found only six papers in their systematic review whose QAREL score was between 50 and 70%, indicating that the overall quality of the studies reviewed did not reach a substantial level of quality.…”
Section: Cross Line Laser Measurement Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cooperstein and Hickey [22] systematically reviewed studies of PSIS palpation and reported that their QAREL quality score was only 46% [44]. Mine et al [25] even found only six papers in their systematic review whose QAREL score was between 50 and 70%, indicating that the overall quality of the studies reviewed did not reach a substantial level of quality.…”
Section: Cross Line Laser Measurement Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reputation of PSIS palpation-based diagnostics is low because it is reportedly not reliable enough to detect accurate landmarks [22][23][24][25][26]. Nevertheless, a much higher detection rate is documented for investigators experienced in PSIS palpation [23,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parallel to the radiologic examinations, methods based on palpation of the selected landmarks in the pelvic girdle area are used. Unlike radiology, they are less reliable and show great randomness ( Stovall and Kumar, 2010 ; Kilby et al, 2012 ; Li et al, 2016 ; Mine et al, 2022 ). The result of a search for methods which would be at least partially as reliable as radiologic methods, are assessments using three-plane image analysis systems ( Furian et al, 2013 ; Yu et al, 2020 ) or simple measuring devices like Palpation Meter or Duometer ( Levangie, 1999 ; Petrone et al, 2003 ; Bibrowicz and Bibrowicz, 2011a , 2011b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%