2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)83371-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability and validity of the Alzheimer's diseases assessment scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-COG) among chinese elderly people in Hong Kong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every subject also received full physical and neurological examination. Standardized cognitive assessment tools including the Chinese versions of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [16], Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) [17] and Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT) were performed for all subjects. The DWRT was modified from the Luria Memory Words Test [18] and consisted of 10 Chinese words.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every subject also received full physical and neurological examination. Standardized cognitive assessment tools including the Chinese versions of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [16], Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) [17] and Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT) were performed for all subjects. The DWRT was modified from the Luria Memory Words Test [18] and consisted of 10 Chinese words.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subjects underwent full physical and neurological examination, standardized cognitive assessments, and a 1-hour battery of neuropsychological tests, as reported in our previous studies (Chu et al 2009). Standardized cognitive assessment tools including the Chinese versions of the MMSE (Chiu et al 1994), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (Chu et al 2000), and Delayed 10-Word Recall Test were used. For verbal memory, the Logical Memory subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale-third edition and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test were administered (Petersen et al 1992;Weschler 1997).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total possible score is 70, with increasing scores indicating a greater severity of impairment. A locally validated Chinese version for the screening of subjects with AD has been developed [17] .…”
Section: Semantic Fluency In Questionable Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%