2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-0036-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative influence of catchment and site variables on fish and macroinvertebrate richness in cerrado biome streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
14

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
66
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well established that the loss of riparian vegetation can be detrimental to several stream characteristics and processes, such as sediment filtration, bank and flow stability, and channel shading with resultant changes in temperature and primary production regulation (Karr and Schlosser 1978;Peterjohn and Correll 1984;Osborne and Koviacic 1993;Sweeney 1993;Nerbonne and Vondracek 2001;Wang et al 2006b;Sály et al 2011;Macedo et al 2014). However the common focus on management priorities within the riparian zone usually implies that the rest of the catchment is completely ignored (Allan et al 1997).…”
Section: The Importance Of Catchment Scale Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well established that the loss of riparian vegetation can be detrimental to several stream characteristics and processes, such as sediment filtration, bank and flow stability, and channel shading with resultant changes in temperature and primary production regulation (Karr and Schlosser 1978;Peterjohn and Correll 1984;Osborne and Koviacic 1993;Sweeney 1993;Nerbonne and Vondracek 2001;Wang et al 2006b;Sály et al 2011;Macedo et al 2014). However the common focus on management priorities within the riparian zone usually implies that the rest of the catchment is completely ignored (Allan et al 1997).…”
Section: The Importance Of Catchment Scale Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…high water temperatures relative to similar elevations at other latitudes, high levels of hydrological periodicity with intense rainfall and runoff, distinct structural features of tropical vegetation) and high natural environmental heterogeneity (Junk and Wantzen 2004;Ortiz-Zayas et al 2005;Boulton et al 2008;Boyero et al 2009). Natural regional differences are reflected in regional instream habitat and biological differences in tropical (Pinto et al 2009;Uriarte et al 2011;Macedo et al 2014) and temperate (Whittier et al 1988;Allan et al 1997;Hughes et al 2006) streams. A major research challenge therefore, is to untangle how rapidly changing disturbance processes interact with high levels of natural environmental heterogeneity to influence the structure and diversity of tropical stream habitats in different regions and over gradients of LUC (Ramírez et al 2008;Boyero et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For French streams, Marzin et al [27] reported that anthropogenic variables at network riparian, catchment, shared site-riparian, or shared site-catchment scales explained more variation than sitescale anthropogenic variables. However, Macedo et al [28] determined that site variables in Brazilian streams explained more variability in fish species richness than did catchment land use variables. For additional reading on landscape-scale effects on fish assemblages, see the books by Hughes et al [29] and Yeakley et al [30].…”
Section: Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between each transect, we measured thalweg depth and channel slope (with a clinometer). All variables were assessed as described in Peck et al (2006) through use of pre-printed field forms that were widely used in similar studies (Hughes & Peck, 2008;Bryce et al, 2010;Macedo et al, 2014;Leal et al, 2016). From the site variables measured in the field, we calculated 11 physical habitat metrics according to Kaufmann et al (1999) ( Table 1).…”
Section: N T Junqueira D R Macedo R C R Souza R M Hughesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they cause many environmental changes such as physical habitat loss, sedimentation, bank erosion and bed destabilization, contaminant loadings, canopy opening, and nutrient enrichment (Allan, 2004). Moreover, local habitat conditions are directly or indirectly affected by catchment conditions, including land use changes (e.g., Sály et al, 2011;Marzin et al, 2012;Macedo et al, 2014). Local habitat conditions are a fundamental factor for determining the structure and composition of stream biota (Schlosser, 1982;Rosenzweig, 1995;Harding et al, 1998;Brown et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%