“…This particular sequence of testing order is practical, produces little, if any, subject loss (< l%), allows administration of all conditions around one feeding, is not overly stressful or tiring even for neonates, and allows testing using comparable conditions at 1 month in a single laboratory visit (with only locale, hospital vs. laboratory, differing). Table 1 lists the demographic information for the 180 infants broken down by cocaine exposure and prenatal care for birth weight (BW), estimated gestational age (EGA; according to Ballard, Novak, & Driver, 1979), head circumference (HC), heelto-crown body length (length), relative intrauterine growth (RIUG; defined by the normalized deviation of observed BW from expected BW for a given EGA using norms from Lubchenco, Hansman, & Boyd, 1966; also see Brown et al, 1990), 1-and 5-min Apgar scores, postconceptional age at newborn (PCA-NB) and at 1 month (PCA-Imo) tests, ethnic distribution, and gender. Replicating other studies (e.g., Singer, Arendt, Song, Warshawsky, & Kliegman, 1994), cocaine usage in our sample significantly covaried with the incidence of infants with inadequate prenatal care as well as minority status (Black and Hispanic populations combined) (Yates corrected chi-square = 20.97, p < .0001 for prenatal care; Yates corrected chi-square = 81.02, p < .0001 for minority status).…”