2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between water status and chlorophyll a fluorescence in grapes (Vitis spp.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6c). However, as the grapes dehydrate, the efficiency of their photosystems declines (Wright et al 2008), the sharpness of the incline in fluorescence at the low f values is reduced, and the overestimation of the y-intercept also decreases, which may be interpreted (in terms as F α values) as a factor influencing the minimum fluorescence parameter downwards relative to mass loss (Fig. 6c-f).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6c). However, as the grapes dehydrate, the efficiency of their photosystems declines (Wright et al 2008), the sharpness of the incline in fluorescence at the low f values is reduced, and the overestimation of the y-intercept also decreases, which may be interpreted (in terms as F α values) as a factor influencing the minimum fluorescence parameter downwards relative to mass loss (Fig. 6c-f).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The greater propensity for the PFM minimum fluorescence value to decline relative to grape mass loss compared with the PAM value likely occurred due to: 1) sensitivity to a decreasing F m factor, and 2) an overestimation of F α during periods of high curvilinearity in the f versus F plots. Both F m and F v have been shown to significantly decrease in both grape cultivars over the course of dehydration (Wright et al 2008). If the F α values were influenced by this decreasing F m parameter [there is evidence for this based on the similarity of the mass loss versus F α and mass loss versus vertex height (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations