1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1077(199605)11:3<161::aid-hup784>3.3.co;2-x
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The relationship between subjective ratings of sleep and mental functioning in healthy subjects and patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
8
5
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 10 publications

(28 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
28
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This is consistent with a longitudinal study, which found that improvements on some cognitive tests over time were not related to CFS severity (Tiersky et al, 2001); however, the authors did find a corresponding improvement in fatigue, which the current study did not replicate. Moreover, the deficits in RT were not related to sleep quality; however, it was not possible to examine whether cognitive deficits were restricted to CFS participants with a sleep disorder (as was found by Smith et al, 1996), as only four CFS participants were not classified as poor sleepers. Although high, the finding that 34% of controls were classified as poor sleepers is comparable to the 40% reported for healthy Australian adults of an equivalent age (Magee, Caputi, Iverson, & Huang, 2008).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 98%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This is consistent with a longitudinal study, which found that improvements on some cognitive tests over time were not related to CFS severity (Tiersky et al, 2001); however, the authors did find a corresponding improvement in fatigue, which the current study did not replicate. Moreover, the deficits in RT were not related to sleep quality; however, it was not possible to examine whether cognitive deficits were restricted to CFS participants with a sleep disorder (as was found by Smith et al, 1996), as only four CFS participants were not classified as poor sleepers. Although high, the finding that 34% of controls were classified as poor sleepers is comparable to the 40% reported for healthy Australian adults of an equivalent age (Magee, Caputi, Iverson, & Huang, 2008).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 98%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Assessment for the current study was carried out using methods and measuring instruments developed in earlier studies into the illness (Deale at al., 1997; Smith et al, ; Thomas et al, ; In press). Clients contacting AfME about their services were asked to participate in an independent evaluation.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The health status of the patient group was assessed by the 5-item current state of health variable (Smith et al, 1996). Applying this measure at initial assessment (baseline) revealed data indicating that the health status for the cohort was poor; the majority of the group (41%) rating their health as 'bad with some recovery'.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%