The relationship between pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and subjective knee function during rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscectomy: A pilot study

Tichonova, Ana; Rimdeikienė, Inesa; Petruševičienė, Daiva; Lendraitienė, Eglė

doi:10.1016/j.medici.2016.07.005

Cited by 45 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Reviewing all the psychosocial tools that exist is beyond the scope of this paper. Therefore, we specifically chose to review tools that have robust evidence and strong clinical implications on establishing patient prognosis in physical therapy practice (Andersen et al, ; Arnstein et al, ; Asenlof & Soderlund, ; Costa Lda et al, ; Parreira et al, ; Pavlin et al, ; Pinheiro et al, ; Tichonova et al, ; Wahlman et al, ). This review will include the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Pain Self‐Efficacy Questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire.…”

Section: Multidimensional Psychosocial Screening Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reviewing all the psychosocial tools that exist is beyond the scope of this paper. Therefore, we specifically chose to review tools that have robust evidence and strong clinical implications on establishing patient prognosis in physical therapy practice (Andersen et al, 2016;Arnstein et al, 1999;Asenlof & Soderlund, 2010;Costa Lda et al, 2011;Parreira et al, 2018;Pavlin et al, 2005;Pinheiro et al, 2015;Tichonova et al, 2016;Wahlman et al, 2014).…”

Section: Unidimensional Psychosocial Assessment Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Given that psychosocial factors are well‐established predictors of pain and disability, it is crucial that PTs understand how to use existing psychosocial assessment tools. The purpose of this article was to highlight the psychometric properties of six well‐established, clinically relevant tools that specifically identify factors most relevant to physical therapy practice and patient prognosis (Andersen, Karstoft, Brink, & Elklit, ; Arnstein, Caudill, Mandle, Norris, & Beasley, ; Asenlof & Soderlund, ; Costa Lda, Maher, McAuley, Hancock, & Smeets, ; Parreira, Maher, Steffens, Hancock, & Ferreira, ; Pavlin, Sullivan, Freund, & Roesen, ; Pinheiro et al, ; Tichonova, Rimdeikienė, Petruševičienė, & Lendraitienė, ; Wahlman et al, ). These instruments include the Keele Subgroups for Targeted Treatment Back Screening Tool, the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO‐YF), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Pain Self‐Efficacy Questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…| 3 of 18 VAN WYNGAARDEN Et Al. Smeets, 2011;Parreira, Maher, Steffens, Hancock, & Ferreira, 2018;Pavlin, Sullivan, Freund, & Roesen, 2005;Pinheiro et al, 2015;Tichonova, Rimdeikienė, Petruševičienė, & Lendraitienė, 2016;Wahlman et al, 2014). These instruments include the Keele Subgroups for Targeted Treatment Back Screening Tool, the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Assessing psychosocial profile in the physical therapy setting

Wyngaarden

Noehren

Archer

2019

J Appl Biobehavioral Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Physical therapists play a crucial role in managing persistent pain and disability. Since psychosocial factors are important predictors of poor patient outcomes, it is essential that clinicians understand how to utilize validated instruments to assess psychosocial profile in the clinical setting. The following article reviews the psychometric properties and clinical application of the Keele Subgroups for Targeted Treatment Back Screening Tool (SBT), Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO‐YF), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Pain Self‐Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). Results Multidimensional screening tools, such as the SBT and OSPRO‐YF, are useful prognostic indicators of long‐term disability and the presence of yellow flags that may be contributing to patient presentation, respectively. This can guide both the treatment and administration of specific, unidimensional psychosocial assessment tools. The following cutoffs are identified as moderate elevation of psychosocial profile which can be used to inform clinical practice: PCS ≥20, TSK >37, PSEQ ≥40, and PHQ‐9 ≥10. Conclusion Valid and reliable unidimensional and multidimensional psychosocial assessment tools provide important prognostic information to inform a patient's psychosocial profile and subsequently improve clinical efficiency and patient outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Multidimensional Psychosocial Screening Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reviewing all the psychosocial tools that exist is beyond the scope of this paper. Therefore, we specifically chose to review tools that have robust evidence and strong clinical implications on establishing patient prognosis in physical therapy practice (Andersen et al, 2016;Arnstein et al, 1999;Asenlof & Soderlund, 2010;Costa Lda et al, 2011;Parreira et al, 2018;Pavlin et al, 2005;Pinheiro et al, 2015;Tichonova et al, 2016;Wahlman et al, 2014).…”

Section: Unidimensional Psychosocial Assessment Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessing psychosocial profile in the physical therapy setting

Wyngaarden

Noehren

Archer

2019

J Appl Biobehavioral Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common knee injuries (Lange et al, 2015;Tichonova et al, 2016). ACL injuries do not recover spontaneously because of poor vascularization of the injured ligament.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of an Innovative Technology Applied as Virtual Rehabilitation on Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Aydoğdu

Sarı

Yurdalan

et al. 2017

CBUP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, many different technologies on virtual rehabilitation have been produced and used in research. However, existing studies are limited because most of them focus on the balancing ability of the elderly or studied stroke patients with same systems. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the effects of a new virtual rehabilitation system in patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a virtual rehabilitation system using a MarVAJED® system which provides visual and auditory stimulus aimed at educating and controlling the joint proprioception, range of motion, pain intensity, and knee swelling in individuals with an ACL injury. A total of fifteen patients with ACL reconstruction participated in this study. In addition to conventional physiotherapy, a virtual rehabilitation treatment was applied with visual and auditory stimulus for a total of eight weeks, three sessions per week. There were statistically significant improvements in measures of proprioception, range of motion, pain intensity, and knee swelling between pre-and post -treatment (p<0.05). We concluded that this new VR system known as MarVAJED effectively treat ACL patients by improving proprioception, range of motion, and by decreasing pain intensity, and knee swelling.UDC Classification: 617.3 ; DOI: http://dx

show abstract

Association between landing biomechanics, knee pain, and kinesiophobia in athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cross‐sectional study

Ohji

Aizawa

Hirohata

et al. 2022

PM&R

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Kinesiophobia is a fear of physical movement and activity and is known to affect return to sports and second injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Objective: To determine the association among landing biomechanics, knee pain, and kinesiophobia in athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: Clinical center of sports medicine. Participants: This study included 31 athletes who participated in sports after primary, unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (age, median [interquartile range]: 20.0 [7.0] years; body mass index: 22.2 [2.6] kg/m 2 ; time from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 24.0 [23.0] months). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Kinesiophobia was measured using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11. Knee function included joint laxity, strength, and single-leg hop distance. Knee pain intensity during sports activities was measured using a numerical rating scale. Vertical ground reaction force was measured, and electromyography data for the vastus medialis and semitendinosus muscles during single-leg jump landing were collected. Univariate correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were performed to identify the associations between the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 score and outcome measures. Results: There was no correlation between peak vertical ground reaction force and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 score (Spearman's r = À0.17, p = .355). On multiple regression analyses, lower preparatory vastus medialis activity during landing (beta coefficient = À0.51, p < .001) and knee pain intensity (beta coefficient = 0.57, p < .001) were significantly associated with greater Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 scores. Conclusions: In athletes who have participated in sports following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, lower preparatory vastus medialis activity during landing and knee pain intensity are associated with greater kinesiophobia. These findings indicate that interventions to address the landing muscle activity pattern and pain control should be performed to decrease kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

show abstract

The relationship between pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and subjective knee function during rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscectomy: A pilot study

Cited by 45 publications

References 40 publications

Assessing psychosocial profile in the physical therapy setting

Assessing psychosocial profile in the physical therapy setting

The Effects of an Innovative Technology Applied as Virtual Rehabilitation on Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Association between landing biomechanics, knee pain, and kinesiophobia in athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cross‐sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About