The relationship between clinical and recovery dimensions of outcome in mental health

Macpherson, Rob; Pesola, Francesca; Leamy, Mary; Bird, Victoria; Boutillier, Clair Le; Williams, Julie; Slade, Mike

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.10.031

Cited by 75 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Clinical recovery was viewed as disempowering as it emphasised the pre-eminence of professional intervention and alluded to the permanency of severe mental illness (Corrigan, 2002;Ralph & Corrigan, 2005). A difference is displayed in divergence in participant ratings on clinical and personal recovery outcome measures (Macpherson et al, 2016). A difference is displayed in divergence in participant ratings on clinical and personal recovery outcome measures (Macpherson et al, 2016).…”

Section: The Recovery Movement: Clinical and Personalmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The first is commonly referred to as 'clinical recovery', and is focused on the reduction of symptoms, impairment and a return to a level of functioning prior to the development of an illness. The second approach, commonly referred to as personal recovery, is focused on an individual's journey of growth and development, typically defined through social success and personally defined goals (Macpherson et al, 2016). Personal recovery is thereby challenging to define due to its individualised nature (Gilburt, Slade, Bird, Oduola, & Craig, 2013).…”

Section: The Recovery Movement: Clinical and Personalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A new paradigm of youth recovery: Implications for youth mental health service provision

Rayner

Thielking

Lough

2018

Australian Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recovery model and practice orientation is promoted as a central feature of mental health service provision across the English speaking world. Yet the model relies on adult frameworks and its applicability to the youth recovery experience has not been established. The current qualitative study explored the common themes in the recovery experiences of 15 young people aged 18-23 years with severe mental health conditions from the Eastern Metropolitan Region of Melbourne, Australia. The aim of the study was to develop a thematic model of youth recovery utilising the experiences of young people with severe mental illness. These findings are then discussed in relation to common themes found in adult recovery research and in regard to the current understanding of young people and recovery. Qualitative data was inductively coded into a thematic model of youth recovery forming two overarching themes. The first was defined as ecological systems (ES) including three subthemes (personal, systemic, and macro). The second was defined as youth recovery processes drawing narratives from across the ES to form five subthemes (self-belief and resilience; responsibility and personal agency; identity, awareness and acceptance; connection; and hope and positive expectations). The resulting themes revealed the critical importance of the ecological context in the personal recovery experiences of young people. It is contended that recovery in this stage of the lifespan is best conceptualised within this ecological framework. Implications for youth recovery conceptualisation and mental health service delivery are discussed.

show abstract

Section: The Recovery Movement: Clinical and Personalmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: The Recovery Movement: Clinical and Personalmentioning

confidence: 99%

A new paradigm of youth recovery: Implications for youth mental health service provision

Rayner

Thielking

Lough

2018

Australian Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…personal) recovery over clinical recovery (Slade 2009). Empirical data indicate that these are markedly divergent yet overlapping constructs (Van Eck et al 2017; Macpherson et al 2016). More research is required to further operationalize the recovery concept and strengthen the evidence base for the effects, applicability, and acceptability of the recovery approach and its discrete components.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Recovery’ in the Real World: Service User Experiences of Mental Health Service Use and Recommendations for Change 20 Years on from a First Episode Psychosis

O’Keeffe¹,

Sheridan

Kelly³

et al. 2018

Adm Policy Ment Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Little is known about how recovery oriented policy and legislative changes influence service users’ perceptions of mental health care over time. Although the recovery approach is endorsed in many countries, qualitative research examining its impact on service use experiences has been lacking. This study aimed to explore this impact as well as experiences of service utilisation and suggestions for change with people diagnosed with a First Episode Psychosis between 1995 and 1999. Participants had used services during the 10 year period prior to, and 10 years post, policy and legislative shifts to the recovery approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 participants who met criteria for ‘full functional recovery’ and 10 who did not. Data were analysed using Thematic Networks Analysis to develop Basic, Organising, and Global Themes. Over time, recovered participants perceived an improvement in service quality through the ‘humanising’ of treatment and non-recovered participants experienced their responsibility in recovery being recognised, but felt abandoned to the recovery approach. Findings suggest the importance of viewing service users as demonstrating personhood and having societal value; examining the personal meaning of psychotic experiences; and matching expectations with what services can feasibly provide. The implementation and the principal tenets of the recovery approach warrant further investigation.

show abstract

“…This emphasis on empowerment and the person's own experiences can also be applied within postoperative care after hip or knee replacement. The most common distinction of recovery in psychiatric care is that made between personal and clinical recovery (Macpherson et al 2015). Another distinction, between the personal and social approach to recovery has also been made (Vandekinderen et al 2012).…”

Section: Quality Of Recoverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Empowering knowledge and Quality of Recovery after hip or knee replacement

Stark¹

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relationship between clinical and recovery dimensions of outcome in mental health

Cited by 75 publications

References 35 publications

A new paradigm of youth recovery: Implications for youth mental health service provision

A new paradigm of youth recovery: Implications for youth mental health service provision

‘Recovery’ in the Real World: Service User Experiences of Mental Health Service Use and Recommendations for Change 20 Years on from a First Episode Psychosis

Empowering knowledge and Quality of Recovery after hip or knee replacement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About