2015
DOI: 10.1080/1359432x.2015.1042459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between off-job recovery and job resources: person-level differences and day-level dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our findings, one might argue whether the current positioning of detachment from work in the DISC-R Model is warranted. A recent study of Niks, Gevers, De Jonge, and Houtman (2015) showed support for the idea that the particular combination of detachment and job resources may counterbalance high job demands. A remaining question, however, is whether the off-job recovery concept of detachment from work and job resources can simultaneously moderate the relation between job demands and employee outcomes (i.e., three-way interaction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on our findings, one might argue whether the current positioning of detachment from work in the DISC-R Model is warranted. A recent study of Niks, Gevers, De Jonge, and Houtman (2015) showed support for the idea that the particular combination of detachment and job resources may counterbalance high job demands. A remaining question, however, is whether the off-job recovery concept of detachment from work and job resources can simultaneously moderate the relation between job demands and employee outcomes (i.e., three-way interaction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niks et al, 2015). Future research, however, could extend this study by investigating how effects of detachment and creativity unfold overnight.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, individuals who lose or fail to gain (sufficient) job resources will experience psychological distress, negative affect, and lack of motivation, so that their energy resources are depleted (Gorgievski & Hobfoll, ). When energy resources are continuously depleted, normal functioning at work will be hampered and finally mental exhaustion will set in (Niks, Gevers, De Jonge, & Houtman, ). Thus, restoration of depleted resources seems vital in improving workers' health and well‐being (Meijman & Mulder, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effort expenditure of psychological accommodation is inherently related to the so‐called load reactions (e.g., higher blood pressure and fatigue) and may lead to psychological energy depletion (Meijman & Mulder, ). Load reactions can accumulate and may lead to impaired health and well‐being, unless individuals fully recover from work strain (Niks et al, ). If recovery from work strain is inadequate or insufficient, the health impairment process will wear out employee's psychological energy resources (De Jonge, Spoor, Sonnentag, Dormann, & Van den Tooren, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued by de Jonge, Spoor, Sonnentag, Dormann and van den Tooren (), specific job demands should match specific psychological detachment from work; for instance, emotional demands need emotional detachment to reduce psychological strain. Hence, future research could consider another specific type of off‐job recovery (e.g., cognitive, emotional or physical detachment) as a positive moderator in the relationship between job stressor and strain (Niks, de Jonge, Gevers & Houtman, ).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%