1986
|
Sign up to set email alerts
The regulation of the corticomelanotropic cell activity in aves—II. Effect of various peptides on the release of ACTH from dispersed, perfused duck pituitary cells
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
76
4
2
0
Citation Types
0
15
2
0
Year Published
Range
1986
19862026
2026Publication Types
Select...
66
13
Relationship
0
79
Authors
Journals
Cited by 79 publications
(17 citation statements)
References 24 publications
0
15
2
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A synergic effect between AVT and CRF on CORT release has previously been reported in ducks (8). Surprisingly, although both peptides had a secretagogue effect on CORT, a synergic effect was not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the effects of CRF in birds were investigated in several earlier studies using the ovine CRF peptide (8,61), but subsequent characterization of the chicken CRF sequence (60) showed that it differs from the ovine sequence by 7 out of 41 amino acids. Given these differences in peptide sequence, it could be hypothesized that the weaker potency of CRF in inducing ACTH release observed in previous studies compared with AVT was due to the fact that the natural CRF was different from the ovine CRF.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various experimental findings have shown that CRF is more potent than AVP in CORT release in several mammals [rats (19,46,59); ewes (33)]. On the other hand, contradictory results have been reported concerning the respective effects of these two peptides in birds, with CRF being sometimes more active (8,61) and sometimes less active (38,58). To further investigate their respective effects on pituitary activation in LTI and STI genotypes, pharmacological studies were undertaken using CRF or AVT alone or both peptides together.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A synergic effect between AVT and CRF on CORT release has previously been reported in ducks (8). Surprisingly, although both peptides had a secretagogue effect on CORT, a synergic effect was not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the effects of CRF in birds were investigated in several earlier studies using the ovine CRF peptide (8,61), but subsequent characterization of the chicken CRF sequence (60) showed that it differs from the ovine sequence by 7 out of 41 amino acids. Given these differences in peptide sequence, it could be hypothesized that the weaker potency of CRF in inducing ACTH release observed in previous studies compared with AVT was due to the fact that the natural CRF was different from the ovine CRF.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various experimental findings have shown that CRF is more potent than AVP in CORT release in several mammals [rats (19,46,59); ewes (33)]. On the other hand, contradictory results have been reported concerning the respective effects of these two peptides in birds, with CRF being sometimes more active (8,61) and sometimes less active (38,58). To further investigate their respective effects on pituitary activation in LTI and STI genotypes, pharmacological studies were undertaken using CRF or AVT alone or both peptides together.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The weaker potency of a host of other peptides and amines with respet to ACTH release found within hypophysiotropic pathways has further streng thened this presumption [ 1.27, 29], In most cases, however, the bioassay of these other peptides and amines has been made on rat anterior pituitary primary cultures or tumor cell lines. There is no doubt from several in vivo and in vitro studies that CRF is the most potent ACTH secretagogue in the rat [1,24,27,29]; recent studies in other species [5,II,15], however, and the data in this paper, would suggest that CRF is not the most potent secretagogue in all species.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 47%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, this again allows two possible interpretations: 1) only oCRF and rCRF were tested, which starling CRF receptors may not recognize; or 2) CRF is not an ACTH secretagog in this species. There is evidence that CRF may not be the primary ACTH secretagog in other avian species (8,33). Because no effect was found, CRF was not used in the chronic stress part of the study.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A synergic effect between AVT and CRF on CORT release has previously been reported in ducks (8). Surprisingly, although both peptides had a secretagogue effect on CORT, a synergic effect was not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the effects of CRF in birds were investigated in several earlier studies using the ovine CRF peptide (8,61), but subsequent characterization of the chicken CRF sequence (60) showed that it differs from the ovine sequence by 7 out of 41 amino acids. Given these differences in peptide sequence, it could be hypothesized that the weaker potency of CRF in inducing ACTH release observed in previous studies compared with AVT was due to the fact that the natural CRF was different from the ovine CRF.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various experimental findings have shown that CRF is more potent than AVP in CORT release in several mammals [rats (19,46,59); ewes (33)]. On the other hand, contradictory results have been reported concerning the respective effects of these two peptides in birds, with CRF being sometimes more active (8,61) and sometimes less active (38,58). To further investigate their respective effects on pituitary activation in LTI and STI genotypes, pharmacological studies were undertaken using CRF or AVT alone or both peptides together.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The weaker potency of a host of other peptides and amines with respet to ACTH release found within hypophysiotropic pathways has further streng thened this presumption [ 1.27, 29], In most cases, however, the bioassay of these other peptides and amines has been made on rat anterior pituitary primary cultures or tumor cell lines. There is no doubt from several in vivo and in vitro studies that CRF is the most potent ACTH secretagogue in the rat [1,24,27,29]; recent studies in other species [5,II,15], however, and the data in this paper, would suggest that CRF is not the most potent secretagogue in all species.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 47%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, this again allows two possible interpretations: 1) only oCRF and rCRF were tested, which starling CRF receptors may not recognize; or 2) CRF is not an ACTH secretagog in this species. There is evidence that CRF may not be the primary ACTH secretagog in other avian species (8,33). Because no effect was found, CRF was not used in the chronic stress part of the study.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A synergic effect between AVT and CRF on CORT release has previously been reported in ducks (8). Surprisingly, although both peptides had a secretagogue effect on CORT, a synergic effect was not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the effects of CRF in birds were investigated in several earlier studies using the ovine CRF peptide (8,61), but subsequent characterization of the chicken CRF sequence (60) showed that it differs from the ovine sequence by 7 out of 41 amino acids. Given these differences in peptide sequence, it could be hypothesized that the weaker potency of CRF in inducing ACTH release observed in previous studies compared with AVT was due to the fact that the natural CRF was different from the ovine CRF.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various experimental findings have shown that CRF is more potent than AVP in CORT release in several mammals [rats (19,46,59); ewes (33)]. On the other hand, contradictory results have been reported concerning the respective effects of these two peptides in birds, with CRF being sometimes more active (8,61) and sometimes less active (38,58). To further investigate their respective effects on pituitary activation in LTI and STI genotypes, pharmacological studies were undertaken using CRF or AVT alone or both peptides together.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The weaker potency of a host of other peptides and amines with respet to ACTH release found within hypophysiotropic pathways has further streng thened this presumption [ 1.27, 29], In most cases, however, the bioassay of these other peptides and amines has been made on rat anterior pituitary primary cultures or tumor cell lines. There is no doubt from several in vivo and in vitro studies that CRF is the most potent ACTH secretagogue in the rat [1,24,27,29]; recent studies in other species [5,II,15], however, and the data in this paper, would suggest that CRF is not the most potent secretagogue in all species.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 47%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, this again allows two possible interpretations: 1) only oCRF and rCRF were tested, which starling CRF receptors may not recognize; or 2) CRF is not an ACTH secretagog in this species. There is evidence that CRF may not be the primary ACTH secretagog in other avian species (8,33). Because no effect was found, CRF was not used in the chronic stress part of the study.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%