2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00116-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The red fox in Australia—an exotic predator turned biocontrol agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this range did reflect the zone of elevated extinction vulnerability, we would expect the extinction size bias to be close to zero for islands with a mean faunal body mass within this range. Instead, these islands tend to have an extinction size bias that is highly positive (figure 1c), suggesting extinctions are more frequent for species above 5500 g. This pattern is actually more consistent with evidence for an upper prey size for foxes of around 10 kg [18]. Dingoes also take prey larger than 5500 g [19], but only three islands have dingoes as the sole large predator species, making it difficult to distinguish their role from that of foxes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…If this range did reflect the zone of elevated extinction vulnerability, we would expect the extinction size bias to be close to zero for islands with a mean faunal body mass within this range. Instead, these islands tend to have an extinction size bias that is highly positive (figure 1c), suggesting extinctions are more frequent for species above 5500 g. This pattern is actually more consistent with evidence for an upper prey size for foxes of around 10 kg [18]. Dingoes also take prey larger than 5500 g [19], but only three islands have dingoes as the sole large predator species, making it difficult to distinguish their role from that of foxes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The wallabies used in this experiment were wild caught and therefore there is no record of their previous experience with predators. However, it is likely that they had encountered some predation risk as both mammalian and avian predators are present at Tutanning Nature Reserve (Blumstein 2002; and indeed the presence of foxes is well documented (Kinnear et al 2002). Prior experience with predators may account for differences in response to predator odours between this study and that of Blumstein (2002), who found that predator-naive Tammar wallabies showed no behavioural response to predator odours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…3a). This is another example of where fox control, when limited to a defined area, can provide some protection outside of the targeted area (see also Kinnear et al 2002;e.g. 'Friend's baited area', Dryandra site).…”
Section: Mount Carolinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banks et al 1998;Kinnear et al 1988bKinnear et al , 2002Thomson and Algar 2000;Start and Mawson 2004). We infer that this reduction in fox numbers is the cause of significant population increases that have occurred in 11 marsupial species, often from extremely low population levels that were barely detectable .…”
Section: Predator-baiting Studies: What Has Been Learned?mentioning
confidence: 99%