1998
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen

Abstract: The differentiation of the urinogenital system and the appendicular skeleton in vertebrates is under the control of Hox genes. The common control of digit and gonad differentiation raises the possibility that patterns of digit formation may relate to spermatogenesis and hormonal concentrations. This work was concerned with the ratio between the length of the 2nd and 4th digit (2D:4D) in humans. We showed that (i) 2D:4D in right and left hands has a sexually dimorphic pattern; in males mean 2D:4D = 0.98, i.e. t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

85
1,419
23
40

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,289 publications
(1,633 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
85
1,419
23
40
Order By: Relevance
“…Men generally have lower 2D:4D ratios compared to women. This sex difference has been shown to be already present in young children (Manning et al, 1998;McIntyre et al, 2006) and even prenatally (Galis, Ten Broek, Van Dongen, & Wijnaendts, 2010;Malas et al, 2006). Furthermore, 2D:4D ratios in children at 2 years of age were significantly predicted by the ratio of testosterone to estradiol levels in amniotic fluid (Lutchmaya et al, 2004;McIntyre, 2006) and digit ratios were associated with circulating sex hormone levels in adults (Manning et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Men generally have lower 2D:4D ratios compared to women. This sex difference has been shown to be already present in young children (Manning et al, 1998;McIntyre et al, 2006) and even prenatally (Galis, Ten Broek, Van Dongen, & Wijnaendts, 2010;Malas et al, 2006). Furthermore, 2D:4D ratios in children at 2 years of age were significantly predicted by the ratio of testosterone to estradiol levels in amniotic fluid (Lutchmaya et al, 2004;McIntyre, 2006) and digit ratios were associated with circulating sex hormone levels in adults (Manning et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D), the hypothesized proxy measure of perinatal androgen action (Manning et al, 1998McIntyre, 2006), was calculated by obtaining a digital scan of the participant's right hand using a Visioneer OneTouch 9220 scanner. Hand images were then printed in color using an HP deskjet 5550 printer, and printed copies were later used to measure the distance (in millimeters) from the basal crease to tip of the second and fourth fingers with digital vernier calipers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, an alternative strategy adopted increasingly in this area of research is to correlate behaviors of interest with a putative measure of perinatal androgen action, such as the ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. Desdicioglu, 2006;Manning, 2002;Manning, Scutt, Wilson, & Lewis-Jones, 1998). Digit ratio also varies predictably between women with typical female prenatal development and women exposed to more "masculine" prenatal hormone levels because of an endocrine disorder (congenital adrenal hyperplasia or CAH) (Brown, Hines, Fane, & Breedlove, 2002;Okten, Kalyoncu, & Yarvis, 2002; but see Buck, Williams, Hughes, & Acerini, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4] Relative finger lengths are determined before birth at around week 13 of gestation, 5 the sex difference is present in children, 4,5 and sex differences in 2D:4D are robust across a number of ethnic groups and races. 3,6,7 The sexual dimorphism in 2D:4D has been known for many years and studies now provide direct and indirect evidence for the suggestion that sex differences in 2D:4D arise from in utero concentrations of sex steroids (for a review see Manning 3 ), with 2D:4D negatively related to prenatal testosterone and positively associated with prenatal estrogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%