2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10701-006-9073-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quantum World is not Built up from Correlations

Abstract: It is known that the global state of a composite quantum system can be completely determined by specifying correlations between measurements performed on subsystems only. Despite the fact that the quantum correlations thus suffice to reconstruct the quantum state, we show, using a Bell inequality argument, that they cannot be regarded as objective local properties of the composite system in question. It is well known since the work of J.S. Bell, that one cannot have locally preexistent values for all physical … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 But if the (A, D) measurements precede the (B, C) measurement, the (A, D) pair never is in any of these states. This is entirely compatible with the fact that evaluating the (A, D) measurements within a certain 11 It has been argued [24] that the phenomenon of entanglement swapping by itself (even without adding the delayed-choice condition with which I will be concerned in the following) calls into question the "ontological robustness" of entanglement. See [27] for a response to this kind of argument.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…13 But if the (A, D) measurements precede the (B, C) measurement, the (A, D) pair never is in any of these states. This is entirely compatible with the fact that evaluating the (A, D) measurements within a certain 11 It has been argued [24] that the phenomenon of entanglement swapping by itself (even without adding the delayed-choice condition with which I will be concerned in the following) calls into question the "ontological robustness" of entanglement. See [27] for a response to this kind of argument.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…I think this is quantummechanically quite true. (Seevinck's result [36], contrary to the claim of the author, does not seem to cast a shadow on the reality of quantum correlations, which are experimental facts; instead, it seems to show that they can be global. )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…17 Seevinck (2006), in particular, takes certain relatively simple proofs to be sufficient for saying that the correlation between entangled particles is not ontologically 'robust', the latter qualification being taken to encompass impossibility, without interaction, of i) creation, ii) elimination via mixing, iii) flow into some environment upon mixing. It is certainly an interesting question whether or not a strong structuralist-like understanding of relations of the sort Saunders suggests requires ontological robustness so defined.…”
Section: Relations and Relatamentioning
confidence: 99%