2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quantitative measurements of foveal avascular zone using optical coherence tomography angiography in normal volunteers

Abstract: PurposeTo provide normative data of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and thickness.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study both eyes of each normal subject were scanned with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for foveal superficial and deep avascular zone (FAZ) and central foveal thickness (CFT) and parafoveal thickness (PFT).ResultsOut of a total of 224 eyes of 112 volunteers with a mean age of 37.03 (12–67) years, the mean superficial FAZ area was 0.27 mm2, and deep FAZ area was 0.35 mm2 (P < 0.001), wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
44
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 20 However, as with all laterally based measurements in retinal images, individual differences in ocular magnification and axial length need to be corrected in order to accurately compare area measurements between subjects or across studies. 1 , 21 The need to measure axial length, as well as the large variation of area seen in normal individuals, 1 3 , 19 , 22 25 makes it difficult to use area as a measure to compare small changes associated with disease progression between subjects or for identifying an FAZ as “abnormal.” While these limitations are less important when assessing repeatability of OCTA during a single visit, 26 they represent important barriers to comparing data across different studies and populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 20 However, as with all laterally based measurements in retinal images, individual differences in ocular magnification and axial length need to be corrected in order to accurately compare area measurements between subjects or across studies. 1 , 21 The need to measure axial length, as well as the large variation of area seen in normal individuals, 1 3 , 19 , 22 25 makes it difficult to use area as a measure to compare small changes associated with disease progression between subjects or for identifying an FAZ as “abnormal.” While these limitations are less important when assessing repeatability of OCTA during a single visit, 26 they represent important barriers to comparing data across different studies and populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the study by Falavarjani et al, OCTA also can perform vascular calibration measurements, but no specific study has used it for measuring hypertension (5) . Ghassemi et al reported that superficial FAZ measured 0.22 ± 0.08 mm 2 and deep FAZ was 0.31 ± 0.11 mm 2 in normal eyes in their study (6) . In our case, superficial FAZ was 0.147 mm 2 on the first day and 0.151 mm 2 at 6 months in the right eye, and it was 0.193 mm 2 on the first day and 0.178 mm 2 at 6 months in the left eye.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Die eingangs bereits beschriebenen Vergrößerungen der FAZ bei vaskulären Netzhauterkrankungen konnten auch mittels der OCT-A bestätigt werden, z. T. bereits bevor klinisch sichtbare Veränderungen auftraten [8,36,37]. Einflussfaktoren, die die Fläche bei Gesunden verändern können, sind u. a., wie auch bereits bei der Fluoresceinangiografie gemessen, ein zunehmendes Alter [38], das Geschlecht [39 -41], zentrale foveale Dicke [39] und die Achslänge [41].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Choi et al hatten mehr Männer in beiden Gruppen eingeschlossen, wir mehr Frauen. Nach Ghassemi et al [39] haben Frauen im oberflächlichen und tiefen Plexus eine größere FAZ-Fläche (p < 0,001) als Männer. Demzufolge hätte man bei den Ergebnissen der Arbeitsgruppe Choi et al kleinere FAZ-Flächen als bei uns erwartet.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified