The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS)

Yılmaz, Emel; Eser, Erhan; Seküri, Cevad; Kültürsay, Hakan

doi:10.5152/akd.2011.105

Cited by 8 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(42 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The validity and reliability study of the scale was made by Yilmaz et al Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.79 to 0.90. The highest and lowest possible score is between 0 and 100, with 0 indicating the best health condition and 100 indicating the worst health condition . Also, the Morisky Adherence Scale was used to measure medication adherence.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of education and telephone follow‐up intervention based on the Roy Adaptation Model after myocardial infarction: randomised controlled trial

Kavradım

Özer

2019

Scandinavian Caring Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Patients’ lifestyle changes after myocardial infarction reduce the risk of infarction. Nursing interventions are important for the initiation and maintenance of lifestyle adaptation. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of education and telephone follow‐up intervention based on the Roy Adaptation Model for improving myocardial infarction patients’ self‐efficacy, quality of life and lifestyle adaptation. Method In this parallel, randomised controlled trial, patients were randomly allocated to a control group or an intervention group (n = 33/group). The control group received routine care, while the intervention group received routine care plus a telephone follow‐up intervention, which consisted of a predischarge education programme and three telephone follow‐up sessions. Data were collected before discharge, in the 12th week after discharge between April 2016 and August 2017. All outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks, and included quality of life, coping adaptation process, self‐efficacy and lifestyle changes. The CONSORT checklist was used in the study. Results In the 12th week after discharge, patients in the intervention group had significant improvements in self‐efficacy, quality of life and coping adaptation process compared with the control group. The intervention group also had more adaptation lifestyle changes concerning patients nutrition and physical activity in the 12‐week follow‐up. Conclusion This study demonstrated that education and telephone follow‐up intervention based on Roy Adaptation Model was had positive and significant results after 12 weeks compared with usual care. The findings of this study are important for supporting nursing practice and health professionals who care for individuals with myocardial infarction to develop nursing care.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of education and telephone follow‐up intervention based on the Roy Adaptation Model after myocardial infarction: randomised controlled trial

Kavradım

Özer

2019

Scandinavian Caring Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been noted that several studies have been conducted using this scale since its initial introduction to the empirical published work. In addition, this scale has been found to possess high reliability and validity values in international research studies conducted in different countries (Yılmaz et al 2011). It is known that if an instrument is to be used in a different languages and cultures, it is necessary to demonstrate that it has similar validity and reliability as the original instrument (Sencan, 2005;Urizar, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale

Rejeh

Heravi‐Karimooi

Montazeri

et al. 2015

Journal of Research in Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessment of quality of life is an important measure of the impact of the disease, and effectiveness of treatment. The myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale is a diseasespecific questionnaire developed for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients following myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties, the Persian version of myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale. The Moreover, it can be used by nurses over the world for both measuring health-related quality of life and determine the effects of different medical and nursing interventions on patients' quality of life.Key Words: Quality of life, myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale, reliability and validity.

show abstract

“…It was stated that the pain scales had di culties in distinguishing emotional states like pain and were criticized for these disadvantages; however, it was also stated that there is a very good correlation between the VAS and the FEES in assessing pain in children, and the emotional aspect is measured through facial expressions [36,37]. In a study, researchers stated that they selected the facial expressions pain scale because there are clear and meaningful facial expressions in the scale.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing A New One-Dimensional Scale To Measure Pain in Children: Pencil Pain Scale

BEYAZ

TÜFEKCİ

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this study was to develop the Pencil Pain Scale as a new one-dimensional scale for evaluating pain in school-age children (6-12 years old).Methods: The population of this study is composed of 6-12 year-old children who gave blood for examination rather than for an acute or severe cause. The research sample included randomly selected children (N= 464) who applied to the blood collection units of a state hospital between November 2017 - February 2018, on three days of the week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday).A questionnaire that specifies the characteristics of children, the newly developed Pencil Pain Scale, and the two widely used scales (Visual Analogue Scale and the Facial Expressions Rating Scale) were used to collect data. The data obtained were analyzed with percentage distributions, mean, chi-square, t-test, ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis, Mann Whitney U test and correlation. Ethical principles were followed in the study.Results: According to expert opinions, it was determined that the Pencil Pain Scale had content validity (Content Validity Index= +1.00). It was found that the scale made measurements similar to a previously conducted study and had convergent validity. Also, the scale was found to be sensitive enough to distinguish the differences and to be reliable (p<.001). It was also found that the Pencil Pain Scale performs measurements that are in agreement with the Visual Analog Scale and the Facial Expression Rating Scale and has parallel form reliability (p>.05). The Pencil Pain Scale was developed in a valid and reliable way. Conclusion: The Pencil Pain Scale is a valid and reliable scale. In order to make the Pencil Pain Scale a standard scale for measuring children's pain, it needs to be used in different studies and age groups with different scales for different pain types.

show abstract

The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS)

Cited by 8 publications

References 23 publications

The effect of education and telephone follow‐up intervention based on the Roy Adaptation Model after myocardial infarction: randomised controlled trial

The effect of education and telephone follow‐up intervention based on the Roy Adaptation Model after myocardial infarction: randomised controlled trial

Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale

Developing A New One-Dimensional Scale To Measure Pain in Children: Pencil Pain Scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About