Infrastructure Productivity Evaluation 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8101-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Productivity of Public Capital: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The productivity of public capital is determined by the parameter α G . Ligthart and Suárez (2005) present a meta analysis that finds an elasticity of aggregate output with respect to public capital of 0.14, which we can replicate by setting α G = 0.1.…”
Section: Steady Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The productivity of public capital is determined by the parameter α G . Ligthart and Suárez (2005) present a meta analysis that finds an elasticity of aggregate output with respect to public capital of 0.14, which we can replicate by setting α G = 0.1.…”
Section: Steady Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aschauer () and Munnell (1991) estimate this elasticity to be around 0.39 when they impose constant returns to scale on all three inputs of production, and 0.20 when they assume constant returns to scale for private inputs. Ligthart and Martin Suarez (), using a completely different methodology, also report an elasticity of output with respect to public capital equal to 0.14. In exercises we have performed but do not report here for economy of space, we show that the assumption of increasing returns is not crucial for the transmission of the Olympic news shocks.…”
Section: News About Olympics In a Dsge Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of Ligthart and Suárez (2005) indicate that studies, which employ the variable core inf rastructure or use data at the national level find larger output elasticities of public capital than studies which apply a different approach. Bom and Ligthart (2008) conclude that the heterogeneity of results in the included studies are mainly due to differences in research design, such as the econometric specification, estimation technique, type of empirical model, type of public capital, and aggregation level of public capital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Ligthart and Suárez (2005), Bom and Ligthart (2008) and Melo et al (2013)), which analyze the determinants of differences across studies. All of the metaanalyses pay more or less attention to the following study characteristics: econometric estimation, model misspecification, data aggregation, measurement of public investment, country and time period and industrial sector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%