2001
DOI: 10.1007/s007750000173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem of a solvent exposable disulfide when preparing Co(II)-substituted metallo-β-lactamase L1 from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Abstract: In an effort to prepare Co(II)-substituted metallo-beta-lactamase L1 from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia for future spectroscopic and mechanistic studies, two methods for the preparation of Co(II)-L1 were tested. Method A involved adding CoCl2 directly to apo-L1 under anaerobic conditions. The resulting enzyme contained 1.9 moles of cobalt and exhibited very little activity, and UV-Vis, 1H NMR, and EPR studies indicated that most of the cobalt in this sample was Co(III). Method B involved reducing the single and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co(II)-substitution has been largely exploited as a fruitful strategy to obtain structural information about the active sites of zinc enzymes by employing the spectroscopic features of Co(II) (38). This characterization has been also applied to MBLs (16,19,39,40). Despite the fact that the four point mutations found in M5 did not occur in the active site, we prepared the di-Co(II) derivative of this mutant to check whether these mutations could have some effect on the metal site structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co(II)-substitution has been largely exploited as a fruitful strategy to obtain structural information about the active sites of zinc enzymes by employing the spectroscopic features of Co(II) (38). This characterization has been also applied to MBLs (16,19,39,40). Despite the fact that the four point mutations found in M5 did not occur in the active site, we prepared the di-Co(II) derivative of this mutant to check whether these mutations could have some effect on the metal site structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations were introduced into the L1 gene by using the overlap extension method of Ho et al (47), as described previously (48,49). The oligonucleotides used for the preparation of the mutants are as follows: D120C forward, CACgCACACgCCTgCCATgCCggACCggTg; D120C reverse, CACCggTCCggCATggCAggCgTgTgCgTg; D120N forward, CACgCACACgCCAACCATgCCggACCggTg; D120N reverse, CACCggTCCggCATggTTggCgTgTgCgTg; D120S forward, CACgCACACgCCAgCCATgCCggACCggTg; and D120S reverse, CACCggTCCggCATggCTggCgTgTgCgTg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B). The intensity of this peak implies that it is due to a ligand field transition rather than from a ligand to metal charge transfer band (expected ⑀ of Ͼ500 M Ϫ1 cm Ϫ1 ) (40). The position of this peak suggests that it arises from Co(III) in the sample, indicating that Co(II) is air-oxidizing to Co(III) during protein preparation at pH 7.5.…”
Section: Preparation and Characterization Of Co(ii)-substitutedmentioning
confidence: 95%